Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (2)
- Abood v Detroit Board of Education (1)
- Administration (1)
- Agreements (1)
- Bargaining (1)
-
- Benefits (1)
- Collective (1)
- Commercial speech (1)
- Compelled (1)
- Compensate (1)
- Decisions (1)
- Dispute (1)
- Drugmakers (1)
- Employees (1)
- FDA (1)
- Fair share (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Friedrichs v California Teachers Association (1)
- Harris v Quinn (1)
- Income (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Justices (1)
- Labor (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Off-label (1)
- Overrule (1)
- Pre-market approval (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Regulatory regimes (1)
- Right to work (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law and Economics
Newroom: Yelnosky: Future Of Public Sector Union 'Dues' 01-14-2017, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newroom: Yelnosky: Future Of Public Sector Union 'Dues' 01-14-2017, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Why Anti-Surcharge Laws Do Not Violate A Merchant's Freedom Of Speech, Annie P. Anderson
Why Anti-Surcharge Laws Do Not Violate A Merchant's Freedom Of Speech, Annie P. Anderson
American University Law Review
First Amendment litigation is surrounding state anti-surcharge laws, which prevent merchants from imposing surcharges on transactions where customers use credit cards. These laws effectively prevent stores from passing credit card "swipe fees" onto their customers. Merchants argue that because the laws still allow them to provide discounts to customers who use other forms of payment, the laws violate their First Amendment rights by impermissibly restricting the way the stores can communicate. The state governments, in contrast, have defended the laws by asserting that they regulate conduct, not business speech, and therefore do not violate the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court …
The Corporation In The Marketplace Of Ideas, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 19 (2017), Matthew Telleen
The Corporation In The Marketplace Of Ideas, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 19 (2017), Matthew Telleen
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tip Of The Iceberg Ii: How The Intended-Uses Principle Produces Medical Knowledge And Protects Liberty, Christopher Robertson
Tip Of The Iceberg Ii: How The Intended-Uses Principle Produces Medical Knowledge And Protects Liberty, Christopher Robertson
Faculty Scholarship
In recent years, the Food and Drug Administration’s pre-market approval process has come under increasing scrutiny as an infringement on liberty and a regulation of speech. In the first part of this symposium contribution, we offer a case study of Seroquel XR, showing how the FDA’s premarket approval process – and the restrictions on “off-label” promotion in particular – caused the drug company to produce and disseminate knowledge about safety and efficacy for new uses. The law successfully resolved the collective action problem of producing knowledge, even while the law protected the liberty of individual doctors and patients to use …