Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Environmental Law (2)
- Property-Personal and Real (2)
- Access rights (1)
- Cellular (1)
- Communications Law (1)
-
- Conseervation (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Indian and Aboriginal Law (1)
- Infrastructure siting (1)
- International Law (1)
- Land trust (1)
- Land use (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Native Hawaiian (1)
- Natural Resources Law (1)
- Police power (1)
- Regulatory takings (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Substantive due process (1)
- Telecommunications (1)
- Water Law (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Land Use Law
“Ua Koe Ke Kuleana O Na Kanaka” (Reserving The Rights Of Native Tenants): Integrating Kuleana Rights And Land Trust Priorities In Hawai`I, Jocelyn B. Garovoy
“Ua Koe Ke Kuleana O Na Kanaka” (Reserving The Rights Of Native Tenants): Integrating Kuleana Rights And Land Trust Priorities In Hawai`I, Jocelyn B. Garovoy
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
The Police Power Revisited: Phantom Incorporation And The Roots Of The Takings Muddle, Bradley C. Karkkainen
The Police Power Revisited: Phantom Incorporation And The Roots Of The Takings Muddle, Bradley C. Karkkainen
ExpressO
This article traces the roots of the current muddle in the Supreme Court’s regulatory takings jurisprudence to an ill-considered “phantom incorporation” holding in Penn Central v. New York (1978), the seminal case of the modern regulatory takings era. The Penn Central Court anachronistically misread a long line of Fourteenth Amendment Substantive Due Process cases as Fifth Amendment Takings Clause cases, misattributing to Chicago Burlington & Quincy v. Chicago (1897) (“Chicago B & Q”) the crucial holding that the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause applied to the states. Like other cases of its era, Chicago B & Q was decided strictly on …
Wireless Telecommunications, Infrastructure Security, And The Nimby Problem, Steven J. Eagle
Wireless Telecommunications, Infrastructure Security, And The Nimby Problem, Steven J. Eagle
ExpressO
This article explores the clash between federal policies encouraging wireless communications services and the application of local land use regulations to the siting of telecommunications towers. It concludes that Congress’s effort to strike a balance in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 between local concerns on one hand and national commerce and homeland security on the other has proved vague in content and susceptible to procedural thickets that might make local parochialism impervious to challenge. The article suggests statutory changes, including time limitations and the creation of presumptions and safe harbor rules, that might better balance infrastructure development needs with local …