Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- AALS 1999 conference (1)
- ADR Scholarship (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- American Association of Law Schools (1)
- Anti-discrimination (1)
-
- Arbitration (1)
- Civil Rights Act (1)
- Clauses (1)
- Common law (1)
- Congress (1)
- Douglas Scherer (1)
- EEOC (1)
- ERISA (1)
- Employee benefits (1)
- Employment claims (1)
- Employment litigation (1)
- Equal Employment Opportunity (1)
- FAA (1)
- Intent (1)
- Intersectional theory (1)
- Mandatory (1)
- Neutral (1)
- Scherer (1)
- Section on employment Discrimination Law: Is There a Disconnect between EEO Law and the workplace (1)
- System (1)
- U.S. employment law (1)
- U.S. labor law (1)
- Workforce (1)
- Workplace (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
Proceedings Of The 1999 Annual Meeting, Association Of American Law Schools Section On Employment Discrimination Law: Is There A Disconnect Between Eeo Law And The Workplace?, Douglas D. Scherer, James C. Sharf, Richard T. Seymour, Maria O'Brien Hylton, Paulette Caldwell
Proceedings Of The 1999 Annual Meeting, Association Of American Law Schools Section On Employment Discrimination Law: Is There A Disconnect Between Eeo Law And The Workplace?, Douglas D. Scherer, James C. Sharf, Richard T. Seymour, Maria O'Brien Hylton, Paulette Caldwell
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Compelling Arbitration Of Claims Under The Civil Rights Act Of 1866: What Congress Could Not Have Intended, Jean R. Sternlight
Compelling Arbitration Of Claims Under The Civil Rights Act Of 1866: What Congress Could Not Have Intended, Jean R. Sternlight
Scholarly Works
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 was a very special statute, designed at minimum to eliminate all "badges and incidents of slavery" and to ensure that the freed slaves would be provided with civil rights equal to those of white persons. Its enforcement depends on the availability of a neutral public system of justice. Private arbitration cannot assure these characteristics. Thus, courts should not enforce agreements to arbitrate future disputes that may arise under this statute. This Article, however, does not argue that arbitration of claims under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 should be prohibited altogether. Disputants who mutually …