Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Labor and Employment Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University

Series

Dismissal

Articles 1 - 11 of 11

Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law

Re Air Canada And Acpa (Thain), Innis Christie Sep 2007

Re Air Canada And Acpa (Thain), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor alleged that the Employer breached the Collective Agreement when it dismissed him after a criminal conviction. The parties requested a "bottom-line decision, without reasons".

This is a consent award. The Grievor is reinstated to employment effective immediately with a Leave of Absence status. The suspension, which occurred before the discharge, is rescinded. While on Leave of Absence the Grievor will not accrue pay or other compensation, but will retain his position on the seniority list. There will be a one year trial period. During this time a number of conditions must be addressed by the Grievor. Jurisdiction is …


Atu, Local 508 V Halifax (Regional Municipality), Innis Christie Feb 2007

Atu, Local 508 V Halifax (Regional Municipality), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was terminated for inappropriate behaviour towards a female passenger. The Grievor did not believe the Employer had just cause and sought reinstatement with full wages and seniority, and the removal of all related documents from his personnel file.

The grievance succeeds in part. Given a previous disciplinary letter regarding similar behaviour, the Grievor should have known that his conduct was not acceptable. Discipline was justified, but dismissal was viewed as excessive in a situation where progressive discipline might be expected. The Grievor is reinstated with several conditions, and with one month suspension without pay. Jurisdiction is retained.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie Jan 2007

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was dismissed for allegedly exposing himself and for not cooperating with the Employer's request for medical consultations. The Grievor denied the event occurred. The Union states that the dismissal was without just or sufficient cause and requests that the Grievor be fully reinstated and compensated for all lost earnings and benefits, and that all material relating to the matter be removed from his personnel file.


Re Provincial Health Services Authority And Peiupse, Innis Christie Jun 2005

Re Provincial Health Services Authority And Peiupse, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Grievance by the Union alleging wrongful dismissal of the Grievor, based on allegations of physical abuse of a patient in one of the Employer's health care facilities. The Union has requested pre-hearing production of various documents in the medical file of the patient who made the allegations. The Employer has refused production based mainly on the P.E.I. Mental Health Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. M-6.1. The parties have agreed that the whether the Employer can and should be ordered to produce the documents in issue is to be decided by the Chair of the Board of Arbitration estab­lished to deal with …


Re Provincial Health Services Authority And Peiupse, Innis Christie May 2005

Re Provincial Health Services Authority And Peiupse, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Grievance by the Union alleging wrongful dismissal of the Grievor, based on allegations of physical abuse of a patient in one of the Employer's health care facilities. The Union has requested pre­hearing production of various documents in the medical file of the patient who made the allegations. The Employer has refused pro­duction based on the P.E.I. Mental Health Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. M-6.1. The parties have agreed that the issue of whether the Employer can and should be ordered to produce the documents in issue is to be decided by the Chair of the Board of Arbitration estab­lished to deal …


Babin V Day & Ross Inc, Innis Christie Feb 2001

Babin V Day & Ross Inc, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

At the hearing before me the Complainant, Mark J. Babin, alleged that he was dismissed unjustly, contrary to sections 240-2 of the Canada Labour Code, by the Employer, Day and Ross Inc. with whom he had been employed since October 13, 1993. From that date to his termination on February 8, 2000, the Complainant was a driver for the Employer, a trucking company, working out of its Dartmouth depot. Counsel for the Employer took the position that the Complainant had "abandonned" his employment and that I am therefore without jurisdiction to deal with this matter. Alternatively, the Employer took …


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Safire), Innis Christie Dec 1996

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Safire), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

This is a Union grievance in which it is asserted that the Employer continued to employ a Part-time Mail Service Courier although he refused to become a member of the Union. The Employer has checked off and remitted his dues to the Union. The Union's position is that in continuing to employ him under those circumstances, the Employer is in breach of the Collective Agreement and requests an order that the Employer terminate this employee if he does not become a member.


Farris V Merks Farms Ltd, Innis Christie Jun 1996

Farris V Merks Farms Ltd, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Complainant, David Farris, alleges that he was dismissed unjustly by the Employer, Merks Farms Ltd., with whom he had been employed since July 1, 1986, as a truck driver. The Employer, a family owned corporation, which operates a trucking company and a variety of farming operations, employing, in all, about seventy people, responds that he was justly dismissed for incapacity to work due to a bad back, after the exhaustion of his short term disability entitlements. There was little dispute about most of the relevant facts, although there were differences about how much contact the Complainant had maintained with …


Re University Of Saskatchewan Faculty Association And University Of Saskatchewan, Innis Christie, Nancy Hopkins, Susie Scott May 1993

Re University Of Saskatchewan Faculty Association And University Of Saskatchewan, Innis Christie, Nancy Hopkins, Susie Scott

Innis Christie Collection

On behalf of Professor Vandervort, The Association, pursuant to article 31.5.5 of the 1991-2 Collective Agreement, contests the President’s recommendation to the Board of Governors that she be dismissed, on the ground that reasons for dismissal do not exist.


Re Corporation Of The City Of Toronto And Canadian Union Of Public Employees, Local 79, Innis Christie, M Tate, Bm W. Paulin Aug 1978

Re Corporation Of The City Of Toronto And Canadian Union Of Public Employees, Local 79, Innis Christie, M Tate, Bm W. Paulin

Innis Christie Collection

Preliminary motion relating to admissibility of evidence.

On October 13, and 14, 1977, Brian Risdon filed grievances un­der the collective agreement between the parties. In the first he alleged that he had been discriminatorily demoted and sought re­instatement to his former position without loss of salary, senior­ity or benefits. In the second he alleged that he had been dismissed without reasonable cause and disciplined twice for the same alleged conduct and sought reinstatement without loss of benefits, wages or seniority and to have the alleged incident stricken from his record. Both grievances were finally denied by letters of January 30, …


Re United Automobile Workers, Local 195, And East Side Plating Co Ltd, Windsor Bumper Co Ltd And East Side Stamping Co Ltd, Innis Christie Jan 1969

Re United Automobile Workers, Local 195, And East Side Plating Co Ltd, Windsor Bumper Co Ltd And East Side Stamping Co Ltd, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The grievor contested with another employee which of them was to do certain work, which led to the grievor's assaulting the other employee. The company discharged the grievor, thus bringing about the present arbitration, the sole issue being whether, in view of the grievor's record, his participation in the fight constituted just cause for his dismissal. There was no direct evidence that the grievor had in fact started the fight and his discharge seems to have resulted from an alleged agreement between the union and company to dis­charge the employee who seemed to have started the fight. The sole arbitrator …