Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
The Union grieved that the Employer has not provided sunglasses to outside workers. The Union wishes a declaration that there was a breach of the Collective Agreement and the "Canada Labour Code" and also wants the Employer ordered to provide an allowance for the sunglasses. The Employer does not accept the Union's position.
Re Secunda Marine Services Ltd And Bradley, Innis Christie
Re Secunda Marine Services Ltd And Bradley, Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
This is an appeal under Section 251.11 of the Canada Labour Code by the Employer, Secunda Marine Services Limited, against a payment order of November 4, 2002 by Paula F. Stagg, Inspector, ordering an additional 21 days of severance pay to the Complainant, Sherman Bradley, in the amount of $2943.15, less deductions permitted pursuant to paragraphs 254.1(2)(a), (b) and (e) of the Code. This is for severance pay covering the period worked December 2, 1988 to March 21, 2002, minus five days severance pay received by Mr. Bradley.
Re Aliant Telecom Inc And Ac & Twu, Innis Christie
Re Aliant Telecom Inc And Ac & Twu, Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
Policy Grievance 01-05 dated November 8, 2001 concerning the Contracting Out of Internet Member Services — Internet Dial Help Desk, which the Union alleges is contrary to Letter of Intent, Appendix E to the Common Part of the Collective Agreement between the Employer and the Union effective January 1, 1999 January 1, 2002, which the parties agree is the Collective Agreement applicable here. At the outset of the hearing, the parties agreed that I am properly seized of this matter and have jurisdiction to grant interim relief.
Babin V Day & Ross Inc, Innis Christie
Babin V Day & Ross Inc, Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
At the hearing before me the Complainant, Mark J. Babin, alleged that he was dismissed unjustly, contrary to sections 240-2 of the Canada Labour Code, by the Employer, Day and Ross Inc. with whom he had been employed since October 13, 1993. From that date to his termination on February 8, 2000, the Complainant was a driver for the Employer, a trucking company, working out of its Dartmouth depot. Counsel for the Employer took the position that the Complainant had "abandonned" his employment and that I am therefore without jurisdiction to deal with this matter. Alternatively, the Employer took …
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Burke), Innis Christie
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Burke), Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
Union grievance alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties in respect of the Postal Operations Group (Non-supervisory): Internal Mail Processing and Complementary Postal Services, which expired July 31, 1989 and remains in force pursuant to the Canada Labour Code, and in particular of Article 10, in that the Employer discharged the grievor without just, reasonable or sufficient cause. The Union requests that the grievor be reinstated and reimbursed for any lost rights, benefits or earnings, and that all reports, letters and documents relating to this matter be removed from his personal file.
Re Canada Post Corp And Lcuc (Merlin), Innis Christie
Re Canada Post Corp And Lcuc (Merlin), Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
Employee grievance alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties signed April 3, 1986, with an expiry date of December 31, 1986 but continued in effect by the Canada Labour Code, in that the grievor was unjustly discharged. on behalf of the grievor the Union requested that he be reinstated without any loss of pay and be sent a letter of apology.
Lcuc V Canada Post Corp, Innis Christie
Lcuc V Canada Post Corp, Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
Employee grievance alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties signed April 3, 1986, with an expiry date of December 31, 1986 but continued in effect by the Canada Labour Code, in that the grievor was unjustly discharged. On behalf of the grievor the Union requested that he be reinstated without any loss of pay and that the letter of discipline be withdrawn from his file. A letter of apology was also requested.
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Gallie), Innis Christie
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Gallie), Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
Union grievance alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties in respect of the Postal Operations Group (Non-Supervisory): Internal Mail Processing and Complementary Postal Services, which expired September 30, 1986 and remained in force pursuant to the extention provisions of the Canada Labour Code, and in particular Article 10, in that the Employer released the grievor from employment allegedly without just, reasonable or sufficient cause. The Union requests that the grievor be reinstated and reimbursed for any lost rights, benefits or earnings and that all reports, letters and documents relating to this matter be removed from her personal …
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Clarke), Innis Christie
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Clarke), Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
Employee grievance alleging that the Employer violated Article 21 of the Collective Agreement between the parties relating to the Postal Operations Group (Non-Supervisory): Internal Mail Processing and Complementary Postal Services, Code: 608/81, which expired September 30, 1986, but which remains in effect by virtue of the Canada Labour Code, and in particular of Article 21.03 in that the Employer unreasonably withheld special leave. The Union requests that the grievor be paid for one hour and fifty minutes of special leave.