Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
Testimony On The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (Enda) And The Religious Exemption : Hearing Before The H. Comm. On Education And Labor, 111th Cong., Sept. 23, 2009 (Statement Of Adjunct Professor David N. Saperstein, Geo. U. L. Center), David N. Saperstein
Testimony Before Congress
We are long past the point when our laws should permit discrimination against any individual because of their sexual orientation. Just as we do not tolerate behavior that discriminates based on race, gender, national origin or religion, so should we be clear about discrimination based on the characteristic of being gay or lesbian. For many of America’s faith traditions, this is a religious value. It is a moral value. And for all of us, it is of great social and economic value, as evidenced by the nearly 90% of Fortune 500 companies that already have policies consistent with ENDA. They …
Reply Brief For Petitioner, Engquist V. Oregon Department Of Agriculture, No. 07-474 (U.S. April 9, 2008), Justin Florence, Mathew Gerke, Neal K. Katyal
Reply Brief For Petitioner, Engquist V. Oregon Department Of Agriculture, No. 07-474 (U.S. April 9, 2008), Justin Florence, Mathew Gerke, Neal K. Katyal
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Petitioner, Engquist V. Oregon Dept. Of Agriculture, No. 07-474 (U.S. Feb. 20, 2008), Justin Florence, Mathew Gerke, Neal K. Katyal
Brief Of Petitioner, Engquist V. Oregon Dept. Of Agriculture, No. 07-474 (U.S. Feb. 20, 2008), Justin Florence, Mathew Gerke, Neal K. Katyal
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Overcoming Resistance To Diversity In The Executive Suite: Grease, Grit, And The Corporate Tournament, Donald C. Langevoort
Overcoming Resistance To Diversity In The Executive Suite: Grease, Grit, And The Corporate Tournament, Donald C. Langevoort
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Once we open the corporate governance/human resources nexus to deeper inquiry, mutual scholarly interest in diversity and discrimination follows naturally. Firms have complex motives to take nondiscrimination and the promotion of diversity seriously. First, at least certain forms of discrimination are both unlawful and socially illegitimate and hence present threats of potential liability and injury to reputation. Second, human resources demands are such that attracting and motivating a diverse workforce is a competitive imperative. At the same time, however, offsetting economic forces may exist that favor subtle forms of discrimination and hostility to diversity, even if intentional and overt racial …
Brief For The Respondent, Chevron U.S.A. V. Echazabal, No. 00-1406 (U.S. Feb. 1, 2002), Chai R. Feldblum
Brief For The Respondent, Chevron U.S.A. V. Echazabal, No. 00-1406 (U.S. Feb. 1, 2002), Chai R. Feldblum
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief In Opposition, Nevada Department Of Human Resources V. Hibbs, No. 01-1368 (U.S. 2001), Cornelia T. Pillard
Brief In Opposition, Nevada Department Of Human Resources V. Hibbs, No. 01-1368 (U.S. 2001), Cornelia T. Pillard
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.