Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- ADR (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Agency reasoning process (1)
- Agency rules (1)
- Alternative dispute resolution (1)
-
- Arbitral proceedings (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Benefits (1)
- CBA (1)
- Civil rights disputes (1)
- Congressional Review Act (1)
- Congressional veto of rules (1)
- Cost-benefit analysis (1)
- Disadvantages (1)
- Empirical research (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Ergonomics (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. (1)
- Industrial terrorism (1)
- Judicial proceedings (1)
- Labor relations (1)
- Labor rights (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Legislation (1)
- New Deal (1)
- OSHA (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Section 118 of the 1991 Civil Rights Act (1)
- Taft-Hartley Act (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
A Cost-Benefit Interpretation Of The "Substantially Similar" Hurdle In The Congressional Review Act: Can Osha Ever Utter The E-Word (Ergonomics) Again?, Adam M. Finkel, Jason W. Sullivan
A Cost-Benefit Interpretation Of The "Substantially Similar" Hurdle In The Congressional Review Act: Can Osha Ever Utter The E-Word (Ergonomics) Again?, Adam M. Finkel, Jason W. Sullivan
All Faculty Scholarship
The Congressional Review Act permits Congress to veto proposed regulations via a joint resolution, and prohibits an agency from reissuing a rule “in substantially the same form” as the vetoed rule. Some scholars—and officials within the agencies themselves—have understood the “substantially the same” standard to bar an agency from regulating in the same substantive area covered by a vetoed rule. Courts have not yet provided an authoritative interpretation of the standard.
This Article examines a spectrum of possible understandings of the standard, and relates them to the legislative history (of both the Congressional Review Act itself and the congressional veto …
Examining Gender Stereotypes In New Work/Family Reconciliation Policies: The Creation Of A New Paradigm For Egalitarian Legislation, Rangita De Silva De Alwis
Examining Gender Stereotypes In New Work/Family Reconciliation Policies: The Creation Of A New Paradigm For Egalitarian Legislation, Rangita De Silva De Alwis
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Industrial Terrorism And The Unmaking Of New Deal Labor Law, Ahmed A. White
Industrial Terrorism And The Unmaking Of New Deal Labor Law, Ahmed A. White
Publications
The passage of the Wagner (National Labor Relations) Act of 1935 represented an unprecedented effort to guarantee American workers basic labor rights--the rights to organize unions, to provoke meaningful collective bargaining, and to strike. Previous attempts by workers and government administrators to realize these rights in the workplace met with extraordinary, often violent, resistance from powerful industrial employers, whose repressive measures were described by government officials as a system of "industrial terrorism." Although labor scholars have acknowledged these practices and paid some attention to the way they initially frustrated labor rights and influenced the jurisprudence and politics of labor relations …
Arbitral And Judicial Proceedings: Indistinguishable Justice Or Justice Denied?, Pat K. Chew
Arbitral And Judicial Proceedings: Indistinguishable Justice Or Justice Denied?, Pat K. Chew
Articles
This is an exploratory study comparing the processes and outcomes in the arbitration and the litigation of workplace racial harassment cases. Drawing from an emerging large database of arbitral opinions, this article indicates that arbitration outcomes yield a lower percentage of employee successes than in litigation of these types of cases. At the same time, while arbitration proceedings have some of the same legal formalities (legal representation, legal briefs), they do not have other protective procedural safeguards.