Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Anti-monopoly (1)
- Antitrust Caucus (1)
- Antitrust enforcement (1)
- Case law (1)
- Compensation (1)
-
- Crimes against property (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Labor Law; Non-Compete agreements; No-Poaching Agreement; Antitrust Regulation; no-hire agreements; No-Switching Agreements; No Cold Call Agreements; Employment Law (1)
- Law (1)
- Legal issues (1)
- MMA (1)
- Mixed martial arts (1)
- Muhammad Ali Expansion Act (1)
- Pro-monopoly (1)
- Recent developments (1)
- Sports (1)
- Sports industry (1)
- Sports law (1)
- UFC (1)
- Ultimate Fighting Championships (1)
- Yale Law Journal Forum (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
Worker Collective Action In The Time Of Fissuring: Independent Contractor Labor Boycotts, The Thirteenth Amendment, And Antitrust Law, Richard Blum
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Talent Can't Be Allocated: A Labor Economics Justification For No-Poaching Agreement Criminality In Antitrust Regulation, Rochella T. Davis
Talent Can't Be Allocated: A Labor Economics Justification For No-Poaching Agreement Criminality In Antitrust Regulation, Rochella T. Davis
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
As of late, labor markets have been a focus point in antitrust enforcement. In 2016 the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced an unprecedented policy to pursue no-poaching agreements criminally. More recently, in January 2018, the DOJ’s Attorney General indicated that the agency is following through on the policy. This Article argues that the DOJ’s new policy is logical and prudent because the economic effects that no-poaching agreements have on labor markets mirror the anticompetitive effects of customer allocation agreements. It also shows that the policy is well-supported by labor economics and antitrust policies. In efforts to comply with the DOJ’s …
The Justice Of Unequal Pay In The Ufc: An In-Depth Analysis Of The Fighters’ Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Against The Ufc And The Misplaced Support Of The Proposed Muhammad Ali Expansion Act, Hunter Sundberg
Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum
In 2016, the Ultimate Fighting Championships (“UFC”) set the record for the largest sale in sports history. The UFC, the primary promotion company of the once fringe sport of mixed martial arts (“MMA”) had matured into a mammoth 4 billion dollar promotion, but not without some growing pains. The league is replete with controversy, mostly dealing with disgruntled athletes over compensation. Athletes of the UFC feel that they are being financially exploited and they may be correct. The athletes are choosing different routes to remedy their pay disparities but they are misguided.
The first course of action chosen by the …
2017 Annual Survey: Recent Developments In Sports Law, Jordan Lysiak, Katherine Hampel
2017 Annual Survey: Recent Developments In Sports Law, Jordan Lysiak, Katherine Hampel
Marquette Sports Law Review
None
Index: Sports Law In Law Reviews And Journals, Jordan Lysiak
Index: Sports Law In Law Reviews And Journals, Jordan Lysiak
Marquette Sports Law Review
None
Index: Sports Law In Law Reviews And Journals, Jordan Lysiak
Index: Sports Law In Law Reviews And Journals, Jordan Lysiak
Marquette Sports Law Review
None
The Ideological Roots Of America's Market Power Problem, Lina M. Khan
The Ideological Roots Of America's Market Power Problem, Lina M. Khan
Faculty Scholarship
Mounting research shows that America has a market power problem. In sectors ranging from airlines and poultry to eyeglasses and semiconductors, just a handful of companies dominate. The decline in competition is so consistent across markets that excessive concentration and undue market power now look to be not an isolated issue but rather a systemic feature of America’s political economy. This is troubling because monopolies and oligopolies produce a host of harms. They depress wages and salaries, raise consumer costs, block entrepreneurship, stunt investment, retard innovation, and render supply chains and complex systems highly fragile. Dominant firms’ economic power allows …