Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Judicial deference (2)
- ADA (1)
- Accounting (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
-
- Banking and Finance (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Disability (1)
- EEOC (1)
- Economics (1)
- Employment Practice (1)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1)
- FASB Stock Option Expense Accounting Financial Statements (1)
- Independent regulatory commissions (1)
- Industrial hygiene (1)
- Interactive process (1)
- Judicial review of administrative acts (1)
- NLRB (1)
- National Labor Relations Board (1)
- Qualified employee (1)
- Reasonable accommodation (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- United States Mine Safety & Health Administration (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
The Doctrine Of Judicial Deference And The Independence Of The Federal Mine Safety And Health Review Commission, R. Henry Moore
The Doctrine Of Judicial Deference And The Independence Of The Federal Mine Safety And Health Review Commission, R. Henry Moore
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expensing Isn't The Only Option: Alternatives To The Fasb's Stock Option Expensing Proposal, Benjamin A. Templin
Expensing Isn't The Only Option: Alternatives To The Fasb's Stock Option Expensing Proposal, Benjamin A. Templin
ExpressO
This paper reviews the arguments for and against the Financial Accounting Standard Board's (FASB) proposal to require that corporations expense options. It identifies two major goals of the proposed rule -- 1) clarity in financial statements and 2) a reduction of corporate fraud by removing the incentive of options. To address these two goals, I adopt a framework of Information Reforms v. Rules of the Game Reforms. The article starts with a history of FASB Statement No. 123 Accounting for Stock-based Compensation and also analyzes the Congressional legislation that attempts to block the measure, the Stock Option Accounting Reform Act. …
Reasonable Accommodation Under The Ada: Are Employers Required To Participate In The Interactive Process? The Courts Say "Yes" But The Law Says "No", John R. Autry
Chicago-Kent Law Review
The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") generally requires employers to "reasonably accommodate" a "qualified" employee's disability. Unfortunately, the ADA is silent as to the appropriate method for fashioning reasonable accommodations. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") issued regulations endorsing an "interactive process" by which an employer and its "qualified" disabled employee work together to devise the proper accommodation. However, the Supreme Court has yet to determine whether courts must defer to these regulations, leaving the circuit courts of appeals to issue differing opinions on whether the EEOC's interactive process is best characterized as a requirement or merely a suggestion.
Thus, …
Isolated And Politicized: The Nlrb's Uncertain Future The National Labor Relations Board In Comparative Context: Introduction, James J. Brudney
Isolated And Politicized: The Nlrb's Uncertain Future The National Labor Relations Board In Comparative Context: Introduction, James J. Brudney
Faculty Scholarship
The National Labor Relations Board has managed to remain unusually detached or isolated in its decision-making even as it has come to operate in an openly partisan manner. There is a certain paradoxical quality to the coexistence of these two descriptors for Board conduct: isolation in agency performance ordinarily suggests a neutral separation from the political process whereas politicization implies a close connection to the elected branches. The explanation for this odd pairing involves a number of factors: some reflect political realities beyond the agency's ability to control, others relate to the structure of the NLRA, and still others are …
The Paradox Of The Misuse Of Administrative Law In Erisa Benefit Claims, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 727 (2004), Mark D. Debofsky
The Paradox Of The Misuse Of Administrative Law In Erisa Benefit Claims, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 727 (2004), Mark D. Debofsky
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.