Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Administrative enforcement (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Agency reasoning process (1)
- Agency rules (1)
- Applicant-flow analysis (1)
-
- CBA (1)
- Congressional Review Act (1)
- Congressional veto of rules (1)
- Cost-benefit analysis (1)
- Current-employment requirement (1)
- Disparate impact (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Ergonomics (1)
- Hiring (1)
- Labor-market analysis (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Legislation (1)
- OSHA (1)
- Private attorneys general (1)
- Protected class status (1)
- Race (1)
- Salting (1)
- Unemployed workers (1)
- Union organizing (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
Union Salts As Administrative Private Attorneys General, Michael C. Duff
Union Salts As Administrative Private Attorneys General, Michael C. Duff
All Faculty Scholarship
The legitimacy of union salting campaigns has been debated frequently and bitterly over the last several years. Salts, the agents of these campaigns, are professional union organizers who apply for, and sometimes obtain – often surreptitiously – employment with non-union employers in furtherance of union objectives. Although recent decisions of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), under the influence of the W. Bush administration, have erected administrative and legal roadblocks to the conduct of salting campaigns, it is likely that the “Obama Board” will revisit the issues surrounding them. This article argues that salts have served a legitimate function by …
A Cost-Benefit Interpretation Of The "Substantially Similar" Hurdle In The Congressional Review Act: Can Osha Ever Utter The E-Word (Ergonomics) Again?, Adam M. Finkel, Jason W. Sullivan
A Cost-Benefit Interpretation Of The "Substantially Similar" Hurdle In The Congressional Review Act: Can Osha Ever Utter The E-Word (Ergonomics) Again?, Adam M. Finkel, Jason W. Sullivan
All Faculty Scholarship
The Congressional Review Act permits Congress to veto proposed regulations via a joint resolution, and prohibits an agency from reissuing a rule “in substantially the same form” as the vetoed rule. Some scholars—and officials within the agencies themselves—have understood the “substantially the same” standard to bar an agency from regulating in the same substantive area covered by a vetoed rule. Courts have not yet provided an authoritative interpretation of the standard.
This Article examines a spectrum of possible understandings of the standard, and relates them to the legislative history (of both the Congressional Review Act itself and the congressional veto …
Excluding Unemployed Workers From Job Opportunities: Why Disparate Impact Protections Still Matter, Helen Norton
Excluding Unemployed Workers From Job Opportunities: Why Disparate Impact Protections Still Matter, Helen Norton
Publications
No abstract provided.