Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (4)
- Constitutional law (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Administrative agencies (1)
- Administrative hearings (1)
-
- Alexand Meiklejohn theory (1)
- Applicant-flow analysis (1)
- Arbitrary dismissals (1)
- Civil Service Retirement Act (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Conditions on public employment (1)
- Congress (1)
- Courts (1)
- Current-employment requirement (1)
- Disparate impact (1)
- Due process (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Employment law (1)
- Employment practice (1)
- Exemption power (1)
- Federal employees (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fitness inquiries (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom of assembly (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Government employees (1)
- Hatch Act (1)
- Hiring (1)
- Hoffman Plastic (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
Where You Stand Depends On Where You Sit: Bureaucratic Politics In Federal Workplace Agencies Serving Undocumented Workers, Ming H. Chen
Where You Stand Depends On Where You Sit: Bureaucratic Politics In Federal Workplace Agencies Serving Undocumented Workers, Ming H. Chen
Publications
This Article integrates social science theory about immigrant incorporation and administrative agencies with empirical data about immigrant-serving federal workplace agencies to illuminate the role of bureaucracies in the construction of rights. More specifically, it contends that immigrants' rights can be protected when workplace agencies incorporate immigrants into labor law enforcement in accordance with the agencies' professional ethos and organizational mandates. Building on Miles' Law that "where you stand depends on where you sit," this Article argues that agencies exercise discretion in the face of contested law and in contravention to a political climate hostile to undocumented immigrants for the purpose …
Excluding Unemployed Workers From Job Opportunities: Why Disparate Impact Protections Still Matter, Helen Norton
Excluding Unemployed Workers From Job Opportunities: Why Disparate Impact Protections Still Matter, Helen Norton
Publications
No abstract provided.
Skepticism And Expertise: The Supreme Court And The Eeoc, Melissa Hart
Skepticism And Expertise: The Supreme Court And The Eeoc, Melissa Hart
Publications
The Supreme Court regularly denies deference to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's interpretations of the federal antidiscrimination laws which that agency is charged with enforcing and interpreting. The Court's lack of deference for EEOC interpretation is in part a function of the analytical framework that the Court has created for assessing the deference due to different types of administrative interpretation. But this essay argues that the Court's lack of deference cannot be entirely explained with reference to these neutral analytical criteria. The Court's attitude toward the EEOC may also be explained as a consequence both of judicial reluctance to view …
Moderator's Remarks, Institutional Due Process In The Twenty-First Century: The Future Of The Hearing Requirement, Harold H. Bruff
Moderator's Remarks, Institutional Due Process In The Twenty-First Century: The Future Of The Hearing Requirement, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.
Presidential Exemption From Mandatory Retirement Of Members Of The Independent Regulatory Commissions, Harold H. Bruff
Presidential Exemption From Mandatory Retirement Of Members Of The Independent Regulatory Commissions, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.
Unconstitutional Conditions Upon Public Employment: New Departures In The Protection Of First Amendment Rights, Harold H. Bruff
Unconstitutional Conditions Upon Public Employment: New Departures In The Protection Of First Amendment Rights, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.