Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
-
- Evidence (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Judges (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Military, War, and Peace (2)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Applied Statistics (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (1)
- Probability (1)
- Statistics and Probability (1)
- Institution
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Review Of A Book "Bedayatu Almujtahid, And Nihayatu Almuqtasid, Mohammed Suleiman Alnoor
Review Of A Book "Bedayatu Almujtahid, And Nihayatu Almuqtasid, Mohammed Suleiman Alnoor
UAEU Law Journal
This review aims at highlighting the status of this book: "Bedayatu Almujtahid Wa Nihayatu Almuqtasid". The review identifies the book, the author, his method in this book, and the subjects the terms used in it.
It also aims at identifying some of the books that drew on the book by studying the subjects of the book and the Fiqh resources that handled this book.
Standards Of Review In Texas, W. Wendell Hall, Ryan G. Anderson
Standards Of Review In Texas, W. Wendell Hall, Ryan G. Anderson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
Teaching The Quandary Of Statistical Jurisprudence: A Review-Essay On Math On Trial By Schneps And Colmez, Noah Giansiracusa
Teaching The Quandary Of Statistical Jurisprudence: A Review-Essay On Math On Trial By Schneps And Colmez, Noah Giansiracusa
Journal of Humanistic Mathematics
This review-essay on the mother-and-daughter collaboration Math on Trial stems from my recent experience using this book as the basis for a college freshman seminar on the interactions between math and law. I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of this book as an accessible introduction to this enigmatic yet deeply important topic. For those considering teaching from this text (a highly recommended endeavor) I offer some curricular suggestions.
Beyond Formalist Sovereignty: Who Can Represent "We The People Of The United States" Today?, David Chang
Beyond Formalist Sovereignty: Who Can Represent "We The People Of The United States" Today?, David Chang
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Guarding The Guardians: Judges' Rights And Virginia's Judicial Inquiry And Review Commission, Jeffrey D. Mcmahan Jr.
Guarding The Guardians: Judges' Rights And Virginia's Judicial Inquiry And Review Commission, Jeffrey D. Mcmahan Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Bean: Shoveling After The Elephant., Pannal Alan Sanders
United States V. Bean: Shoveling After The Elephant., Pannal Alan Sanders
St. Mary's Law Journal
Over the years Congress has enacted and amended several versions of the United States Code (U.S.C) § 925(c). Several reported cases illustrate the courts’ early efforts to develop a coherent body of jurisprudence with respect to the procedural and substantive aspects of U.S.C. § 925(c) judicial review. Specifically, the § 925(c) denials of relief by the Director before the congressional appropriations ban commenced in 1993. Although the methodology and reasoning behind these decisions differ in their details, several themes are discernable. First, even without the express provisions for judicial review added by the Firearms Owners Protection Act (FOPA), courts consistently …
When Parents And Educators Clash: Are Special Education Students Entitled To A Cadillac Education., Judith Deberry
When Parents And Educators Clash: Are Special Education Students Entitled To A Cadillac Education., Judith Deberry
St. Mary's Law Journal
Due to the ambiguous language of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), there is uncertainty concerning IDEA’s requirements. IDEA mandates that all school districts receiving federal education monies provide for the education of disabled students. According to IDEA, each state must provide disabled children with “free appropriate public education” (FAPE) that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet the student’s unique needs and prepare him or her for employment and independent living. Parents have argued that IDEA requires school districts to compensate them for commercial programs and private school costs. Courts have held that an individual education …