Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Adult and Continuing Education Administration (1)
- American Politics (1)
- Behavioral Economics (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations (1)
-
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Business and Corporate Communications (1)
- Communication (1)
- Community College Education Administration (1)
- Comparative Politics (1)
- Courts (1)
- Curriculum and Social Inquiry (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Economic History (1)
- Economic Theory (1)
- Economics (1)
- Education (1)
- Educational Administration and Supervision (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Elementary and Middle and Secondary Education Administration (1)
- Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations (1)
- Higher Education Administration (1)
- Industrial Organization (1)
- International Relations (1)
- Labor Economics (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
This short nontechnical article reviews the Arrow Impossibility Theorem and its implications for rational democratic decisionmaking. In the 1950s, economist Kenneth J. Arrow proved that no method for producing a unique social choice involving at least three choices and three actors could satisfy four seemingly obvious constraints that are practically constitutive of democratic decisionmaking. Any such method must violate such a constraint and risks leading to disturbingly irrational results such and Condorcet cycling. I explain the theorem in plain, nonmathematical language, and discuss the history, range, and prospects of avoiding what seems like a fundamental theoretical challenge to the possibility …
The Promise And Paradox Of Max Weber's Legal Sociology: The "Categories Of Legal Thought" As Types Of Meaningful Action And The Persistence Of The Problem Of Judicial Legisaltion, Faisal Chaudhry
Faisal Chaudhry
Unsurpassed in its ambition and historical scope, Max Weber's legal sociology centers around the four "categories of legal thought" that follow from his distinction between formal and substantive modes of rationality and irrationality in the conduct of lawfinding and lawmaking activity. At the same time, Weber's general sociology is built around four ideal types of possible meaningful conduct by individual actors, ranging from the instrumentally rational to the affective. Despite its visibility, the lack of meaningful connection Weber makes between these two categorical schemes has never adequately been remedied or even explained by his inheritors. This article seeks to do …