Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (2)
- AKZO (1)
- AKZO Chemie BV (1)
- Abusive conduct (1)
- Act of state doctrine (1)
-
- Alfred Dunhill of London Inc. v. Republic of Cuba (1)
- American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J.P. Maguire & Co. (1)
- American legal history (1)
- Anti-fraud (1)
- Anticompetitive (1)
- Antitrust exemption (1)
- Areeda-Turner test (1)
- Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino (1)
- Bernstein exception (1)
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited (1)
- Classical legal thought (1)
- Commercial activity exception (1)
- Confiscated property (1)
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. (1)
- Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1)
- Corporate law (1)
- Cost analysis (1)
- Daniel v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (1)
- Defense (1)
- ECS (1)
- ECS/AKZO test (1)
- EEC (1)
- ERISA (1)
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight Inc. (1)
- Economic history (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Constitutional Law, Import-Export Clause: Non-Discriminatory, Fairly Apportioned Excise Tax Applied To Stevedoring Companies Loading And Unloading Goods In Imports And Export Transit Does Not Constitute An Import Or Duty Within The Prohibition Of The Import-Export Clause, Tony G. Mills
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Anti-Fraud Provisions Of The Securities Act; Erisa; Pension Plans; Section 17(A) Private Right Of Action; Daniel V. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Marlene P. Emery, Barbara M. Heinzerling
Anti-Fraud Provisions Of The Securities Act; Erisa; Pension Plans; Section 17(A) Private Right Of Action; Daniel V. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Marlene P. Emery, Barbara M. Heinzerling
Akron Law Review
In Daniel v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the federal securities laws apply to disclosure of information regarding employee pension and profit sharing plans. In an era when disclosure of information has become mandatory and commonplace, it is not surprising that relevant information on pension plans should be disclosed to employees. The important aspect of this case is that disclosure was required under the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, rather than under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Questions concerning the Securities and Exchange Commission's jurisdiction over …
Refusals To Deal By Monopolists - Recent Decisions, Thomas J. Collin
Refusals To Deal By Monopolists - Recent Decisions, Thomas J. Collin
Akron Law Review
This article will review and evaluate these recent principal cases, both judicial and administrative, in which single-firm refusals to deal by monopolists have been challenged under section 2 of the Sherman Act or, by analogy, under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. It will demonstrate that there is no reason to depart from conventional monopolization analysis in deciding these cases.
Three Strikes And You're Out: An Investigation Of Professional Baseball's Antitrust Exemption, H. Ward Classen
Three Strikes And You're Out: An Investigation Of Professional Baseball's Antitrust Exemption, H. Ward Classen
Akron Law Review
This Article will examine the economic structure of the professional sports industry, explore professional baseball's judicially created exemption from antitrust laws and discuss the impact of the Federal Baseball Club v. National League and subsequent decisions on the professional sports industry. Finally, this Article will demonstrate that while baseball's antitrust exemption may have been justified sixty-five years ago, it now promotes economic inefficiency and infringes upon the constitutional rights of professional baseball players to freely market their talents.
Petitioning Foreign Governments: The Act Of State And Noerr-Pennington Doctrines, Don R. Sampen
Petitioning Foreign Governments: The Act Of State And Noerr-Pennington Doctrines, Don R. Sampen
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Arbitration - Arbitrability Of Antitrust Claims Arising From An International Commercial Contract - Mitsubishi Motors Corp. V. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 105 S. Ct. 3346 (1985)., William L. Blagg
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The European Commission's Ecs/Akzo Standard For Predatory Pricing In The E.E.C.: Deterrence Or Disorder?, Thomas G. Ehr
The European Commission's Ecs/Akzo Standard For Predatory Pricing In The E.E.C.: Deterrence Or Disorder?, Thomas G. Ehr
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Progressive Legal Thought, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Progressive Legal Thought, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
A widely accepted model of American legal history is that "classical" legal thought, which dominated much of the nineteenth century, was displaced by "progressive" legal thought, which survived through the New Deal and in some form to this day. Within its domain, this was a revolution nearly on a par with Copernicus or Newton. This paradigm has been adopted by both progressive liberals who defend this revolution and by classical liberals who lament it.
Classical legal thought is generally identified with efforts to systematize legal rules along lines that had become familiar in the natural sciences. This methodology involved not …