Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Abortion rights (1)
- American Legion decision (1)
- Autonomous view of law (1)
-
- Casey (1)
- Docket books (1)
- Entanglement jurisprudence (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- Feminist (1)
- Freshman effect (1)
- Ginsburg (1)
- Harlan Fiske Stone (1)
- Justice Anthony Kennedy (1)
- Oral dissent (1)
- Originalist (1)
- Pierce Butler (1)
- Planned Parenthood (1)
- Religious groups (1)
- Responsive view of law (1)
- Rhetoric (1)
- Scalia (1)
- Secular purpose (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Taft Court (1)
- Three-prong Lemon test (1)
- Unanimity norms (1)
- Vote fluidity (1)
- Whole Women's Health (1)
- William Howard Taft (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Dissenting From The Bench, Christine Venter
Dissenting From The Bench, Christine Venter
Journal Articles
This paper examines the oral dissents of Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg from the year 2000 to the times of their respective deaths. It explores the concept and purpose of oral dissent and details the kinds of cases in which each justice was more likely to orally dissent. The paper analyzes the kinds of rhetoric that each justice used to refer to their subject matter, and argues that Scalia's rhetoric evinces a view of the law as "autonomous", operating independently of the facts of the case. In contrast, Ginsburg's view espouses a view of the law as responsive …
Untangling Entanglement, Stephanie H. Barclay
Untangling Entanglement, Stephanie H. Barclay
Journal Articles
The Court has increasingly signaled its interest in taking a more historical approach to the Establishment Clause. And in its recent American Legion decision, the Supreme Court strongly suggested that the three-prong Lemon test is essentially dead letter. Such a result would make sense for the first two prongs of the Lemon test about secular purpose and the effects. Many scholars have observed that these aspects of the prong are judicial creations far afield of the Establishment Clause history. But what of the entanglement prong of the test? If we rejected all applications of this prong of the analysis, would …
Irreconcilable Differences? Whole Woman’S Health, Gonzales, And Justice Kennedy’S Vision Of American Abortion Jurisprudence, O. Carter Snead, Laura Wolk
Irreconcilable Differences? Whole Woman’S Health, Gonzales, And Justice Kennedy’S Vision Of American Abortion Jurisprudence, O. Carter Snead, Laura Wolk
Journal Articles
A law is unconstitutional if it "has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus."' Twenty-five years have elapsed since a plurality of the Supreme Court articulated this undue burden standard in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, yet its contours remain elusive. Notably, two current members of the Court-Justice Breyer and Justice Kennedy-seem to fundamentally differ in their understanding of what Casey requires and permits. In Gonzales v. Carhart, Justice Kennedy emphasized a wide range of permissible state interests implicated by abortion and indicated …
Inside The Taft Court: Lessons From The Docket Books, Barry Cushman
Inside The Taft Court: Lessons From The Docket Books, Barry Cushman
Journal Articles
For many years, the docket books kept by certain of the Taft Court Justices have been held by the Office of the Curator of the Supreme Court. Though the existence of these docket books had been brought to the attention of the scholarly community, access to them was highly restricted. In April of 2014, however, the Court adopted new guidelines designed to increase access to the docket books for researchers. This article offers a report and analysis based on a review of all of the Taft Court docket books held by the Office of the Curator, which are the only …