Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judicial review (2)
- Separation of powers (2)
- Anthony M. Kennedy (1)
- Constitutional canon (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
-
- Constitutional law & philosophy (1)
- Constitutional law curriculum (1)
- Constitutive constitutional theory (1)
- Contemporary politics (1)
- Courts (1)
- Deference (1)
- Federal judiciary (1)
- Federalism (1)
- H. L. A. Hart (1)
- Heightened scrutiny (1)
- Ideology (1)
- Interest groups (1)
- John Marshall (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial accountability (1)
- Judicial decisionmaking (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justice Kennedy (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Lochner v. New York (1)
- Marbury v. Madison (1)
- McCulloch v. Maryland (1)
- Original & appellate jurisdiction (1)
- Policy agents (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Reconsidering Judicial Independence: Forty-Five Years In The Trenches And In The Tower, Stephen B. Burbank
Reconsidering Judicial Independence: Forty-Five Years In The Trenches And In The Tower, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
Trusting in the integrity of our institutions when they are not under stress, we focus attention on them both when they are under stress or when we need them to protect us against other institutions. In the case of the federal judiciary, the two conditions often coincide. In this essay, I use personal experience to provide practical context for some of the important lessons about judicial independence to be learned from the periods of stress for the federal judiciary I have observed as a lawyer and concerned citizen, and to provide theoretical context for lessons I have deemed significant as …
Kennedy's Legacy: A Principled Justice, Mitchell N. Berman, David Peters
Kennedy's Legacy: A Principled Justice, Mitchell N. Berman, David Peters
All Faculty Scholarship
After three decades on the Court, Justice Anthony Kennedy remains its most widely maligned member. Concentrating on his constitutional jurisprudence, critics from across the ideological spectrum have derided Justice Kennedy as “a self-aggrandizing turncoat,” “an unprincipled weathervane,” and, succinctly, “America’s worst Justice.” We believe that Kennedy is not as bereft of a constitutional theory as common wisdom maintains. To the contrary, this Article argues, his constitutional decisionmaking reflects a genuine grasp (less than perfect, more than rudimentary) of a coherent and, we think, compelling theory of constitutional law—the account, more or less, that one of has introduced in other work …
Mcculloch V. Marbury, Kermit Roosevelt Iii, Heath Khan
Mcculloch V. Marbury, Kermit Roosevelt Iii, Heath Khan
All Faculty Scholarship
This article builds on recent scholarship about the origins and creation of “our Marbury”—the contemporary understanding of the case and its significance—to argue that Marbury is in fact wholly unsuited for the role it plays in Supreme Court rhetoric and academic instruction. While Marbury is generally understood to support aggressive judicial review, or actual invalidation of a government act, it offers no guidance at all for how judicial review should be employed in particular cases—in particular, whether review should be aggressive or deferential. The actual opinion in Marbury makes no effort to justify its lack of deference to the …