Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Law and Society (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
-
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Politics (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Bias (1)
- Burdens of proof (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Costs (1)
- Court costs (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Domestic Relations (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Equality (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Fees (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fines (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- General Law (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
The Constitution And Informational Privacy, Or How So-Called Conservatives Countenance Governmental Intrustion Into A Person's Private Affairs, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 871 (1985), Michael P. Seng
Michael P. Seng
No abstract provided.
Hegelian Dialectical Analysis Of United States Election Laws, Charles E. A. Lincoln Iv
Hegelian Dialectical Analysis Of United States Election Laws, Charles E. A. Lincoln Iv
Charles E. A. Lincoln IV
This Article uses the dialectical ideas of German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1833) in application to the progression of United States voting laws since the founding. This analysis can be used to interpret past progression of voting rights in the US as well as a provoking way to predict the future trends in US voting rights. First, Hegel’s dialectical method is established as a major premise. Second, the general accepted history of United States voting laws from the 1770s to the current day is laid out as a minor premise. Third, the major premise of Hegel’s dialectical method weaves …
The High Price Of Poverty: A Study Of How The Majority Of Current Court System Procedures For Collecting Court Costs And Fees, As Well As Fines, Have Failed To Adhere To Established Precedent And The Constitutional Guarantees They Advocate., Trevor J. Calligan
Trevor J Calligan
No abstract provided.
Believe It Or Not: Mitigating The Negative Effects Personal Belief And Bias Have On The Criminal Justice System, Sarah Mourer
Believe It Or Not: Mitigating The Negative Effects Personal Belief And Bias Have On The Criminal Justice System, Sarah Mourer
Sarah Mourer
This article examines the prosecutor’s and defense attorney’s personal pre-trial beliefs regarding the accused’s guilt or innocence. This analysis suggests that when an attorney does hold pretrial beliefs, such beliefs lead to avoidable bias and errors. These biases may alter the findings throughout all stages of the case. The procedure asking that the prosecution seek justice while having nothing more than probable cause results in the prosecutor’s need to have a belief in guilt before proceeding to trial. While this belief is intended to foster integrity and fairness in the criminal justice system, to the contrary, it actually contributes to …