Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Jurisprudence Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 30 of 46

Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence

Scotus Short Title Turmoil: Time For A Congressional Bill Naming Authority, Brian Christopher Jones Nov 2013

Scotus Short Title Turmoil: Time For A Congressional Bill Naming Authority, Brian Christopher Jones

Brian Christopher Jones

This past summer saw the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. Windsor, and while the case has generated copious amounts of commentary and scholarship, relatively little attention has been paid to the case’s discussion of bill short titles. Central to the case’s analysis was a dispute over the role of short titles in inferring legislative purpose, and given this dispute, this Remark will argue that it’s time for a Congressional bill naming authority to ensure sensible, descriptive bill names.


Whitehead's Metaphysics And The Law: A Dialogue, Jay Tidmarsh Nov 2013

Whitehead's Metaphysics And The Law: A Dialogue, Jay Tidmarsh

Jay Tidmarsh

No abstract provided.


The Jurisprudence Of John Howard Yoder, Thomas L. Shaffer Nov 2013

The Jurisprudence Of John Howard Yoder, Thomas L. Shaffer

Thomas L. Shaffer

No abstract provided.


Toward A Jurisprudence For The Law Office, Thomas L. Shaffer, Louis M. Brown Nov 2013

Toward A Jurisprudence For The Law Office, Thomas L. Shaffer, Louis M. Brown

Thomas L. Shaffer

No abstract provided.


The Christian Jurisprudence Of Robert E. Rodes Jr., Thomas L. Shaffer Nov 2013

The Christian Jurisprudence Of Robert E. Rodes Jr., Thomas L. Shaffer

Thomas L. Shaffer

No abstract provided.


Legal Ethics And Jurisprudence From Within Religious Congregations, Thomas L. Shaffer Nov 2013

Legal Ethics And Jurisprudence From Within Religious Congregations, Thomas L. Shaffer

Thomas L. Shaffer

No abstract provided.


Pilgrim Law, Robert E. Rodes Nov 2013

Pilgrim Law, Robert E. Rodes

Robert Rodes

No abstract provided.


On Professors And Poor People - A Jurisprudential Memoir, Robert E. Rodes Nov 2013

On Professors And Poor People - A Jurisprudential Memoir, Robert E. Rodes

Robert Rodes

This article describes the origin and sources of the author's jurisprudential doctrine, and his adoption of liberation theology as a way of reconciling Sociological Jurisprudence with the philosophy of history. It argues that the pursuit of justice is eschatologically validated even though its historical fruition is problematical. It goes on to discuss the working out in legal practice of the liberationists' call for a preferential option for the poor.


On The Historical School Of Jurisprudence, Robert E. Rodes Nov 2013

On The Historical School Of Jurisprudence, Robert E. Rodes

Robert Rodes

Legal theory has tended to treat the Historical School as a poor relation, but it has important contributions to make. Developed in opposition to the one-size-fits-all form of natural law that eventuated in the Code Napoleon, it attributes law to a Volksgeist, the spirit of a people, as developed in the peculiar historical experience of that people. The original German proponents of the school had trouble explaining the reception of Roman law in Germany, but despite the importation of technical elements from without, a people's laws are in fact part of their culture and of their spiritual heritage as these …


Non-Representational Jurisprudence: A Centennial Reading Of "The Path Of The Law", Robert E. Rodes Nov 2013

Non-Representational Jurisprudence: A Centennial Reading Of "The Path Of The Law", Robert E. Rodes

Robert Rodes

This paper analyzes particular passages in Holmes's famous lecture, and notes important inconsistencies and failings in his approach. After arguing strongly that moral considerations should not enter into legal judgments, he criticizes legal judgments in the light of moral considerations. After defining law as a prediction of what the courts will do, he seems to criticize courts for getting the law wrong in their decisions. His advice to learn the legal profession by studying law from the standpoint of a bad man leaves out of account the numerous potential clients who wish to be law abiding citizens and to seal …


Clinton, Ginsburg, And Centrist Federalism, Russell A. Miller Nov 2013

Clinton, Ginsburg, And Centrist Federalism, Russell A. Miller

Russell A. Miller

Politics' and pathology have converged to heighten speculation that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's tenure on the Supreme Court is nearing its end. Even if the imminence of her retirement is greatly exaggerated, the time to reflect on Justice Ginsburg's lasting contribution to American constitutional law has arrived. Justice Ginsburg is best known for her long campaign to promote gender equality. Her successful advocacy on that issue before the Supreme Court throughout the 1970s led President Clinton to conclude, when announcing her nomination to fill Justice Byron White's vacated seat on the high court, that she is to the women's movement …


Formalism And Realism In Commerce Clause Jurisprudence, Barry Cushman Nov 2013

Formalism And Realism In Commerce Clause Jurisprudence, Barry Cushman

Barry Cushman

This Article attempts a reconceptualization of developments in Commerce Clause jurisprudence between the Civil War and World War II by identifying ways in which that jurisprudence was structurally related to and accordingly deeply influenced by the categories of substantive due process and dormant Commerce Clause doctrine. Antecedent dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence set the terms within which Commerce Clause doctrine was worked out; coordinate developments in substantive due process doctrine set limits upon the scope of Commerce Clause formulations and thus played a critical and underappreciated role in maintaining the federal equilibrium. The subsequent erosion of those due process limitations vastly …


Law, Belief, And Bildung: The Education Of Harry Edwards, Brian C. Murchison Oct 2013

Law, Belief, And Bildung: The Education Of Harry Edwards, Brian C. Murchison

Brian C. Murchison

Not available.


The Natural Relationship Of Church And State Within The Kingdom Of Christ Based On The Encyclical Immortale Dei Of Pope Leo Xiii, Brian M. Mccall Oct 2013

The Natural Relationship Of Church And State Within The Kingdom Of Christ Based On The Encyclical Immortale Dei Of Pope Leo Xiii, Brian M. Mccall

Brian M McCall

This lecture addresses the natural relationship between Church and State and explains Catholic Social Teaching regarding the organization of civil society.


The Case Against Brilliance, Daniel A. Farber Sep 2013

The Case Against Brilliance, Daniel A. Farber

Daniel A Farber

No abstract provided.


Integrating Public Choice And Public Law: A Reply To Debow And Lee, Daniel A. Farber, Philip P. Frickey Sep 2013

Integrating Public Choice And Public Law: A Reply To Debow And Lee, Daniel A. Farber, Philip P. Frickey

Daniel A Farber

No abstract provided.


"Standing" In The Shadow Of Erie: Federalism In The Balance In Hollingsworth V. Perry, Glenn Koppel Aug 2013

"Standing" In The Shadow Of Erie: Federalism In The Balance In Hollingsworth V. Perry, Glenn Koppel

Glenn Koppel

Abstract “Standing” in the Shadow of Erie: Federalism in the Balance in Hollingsworth v. Perry In Hollingsworth v. Perry, one of the two same-sex marriage cases decided by the Supreme Court in 2013, the Court declined to address the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, finding that the initiative proponents lacked standing to appeal the district court’s judgment declaring the proposition unconstitutional and enjoining its enforcement. Since the State’s Governor and Attorney General declined to appeal, the proponents sought to assert the State’s particularized interest in the proposition’s validity. State law, as interpreted by the California Supreme Court, grants authority to …


The Conflict Between Stare Decisis And Ov Erruling In Constitutional Adjudication, Steven J. Burton Aug 2013

The Conflict Between Stare Decisis And Ov Erruling In Constitutional Adjudication, Steven J. Burton

steven J. burton

This article argues that the Constitution constrains the Supreme Court's power to overrule its constitutional precedents. It bases this argument on the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause and the conjunction of Marbury v. Madison, Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, Cohens v. Virginia, and the "case or controversy" limit on federal court jurisdiction.


The Conflict Between Stare Decisis And Overruling In Constitutional Adjudication, Steven J. Burton Jul 2013

The Conflict Between Stare Decisis And Overruling In Constitutional Adjudication, Steven J. Burton

steven J. burton

There is a near-consensus among Supreme Court Justices and constitutional scholars that there is no significant law, and need not be a law, constraining the Court's power to overrule its constitutional precedents. This Essay/Article argues, to the contrary, that the Court's overruling power should be constitutionally constrained for essentially the same reasons that virtually every other federal government power is constrained. It proposes and defends a constitutional law of overruling.


An All Of The Above Theory Of Legal Development, Larry A. Dimatteo Jun 2013

An All Of The Above Theory Of Legal Development, Larry A. Dimatteo

Larry A DiMatteo

This paper reviews different theories of legal development in order to highlight their similarities and differences. In the end, as in contract theories, no monist view of legal development possesses the explanatory power needed to understand how law has come to be and where it may take us in the future. What we do have is a foundation built on at least two millennia of legal history. The intellectual starting point for this project is Nathan Isaacs’ unfinished work on a cycle theory of legal development. His view of legal development takes issue with Henry Sumner Maine’s thesis that development …


Legal Realism As Theory Of Law, Michael S. Green Jun 2013

Legal Realism As Theory Of Law, Michael S. Green

Michael S. Green

No abstract provided.


Leiter On The Legal Realists, Michael S. Green Jun 2013

Leiter On The Legal Realists, Michael S. Green

Michael S. Green

In this essay reviewing Brian Leiter’s recent book Naturalizing Jurisprudence, I focus on two positions that distinguish Leiter’s reading of the American legal realists from those offered in the past. The first is his claim that the realists thought the law is only locally indeterminate – primarily in cases that are appealed. The second is his claim that they did not offer a prediction theory of law, but were instead committed to a standard positivist theory. Leiter’s reading is vulnerable, because he fails to discuss in detail those passages from the realists that inspired past interpretations. My goal is to …


Deadly Dicta: Roe’S “Unwanted Motherhood”, Gonzales’S “Women’S Regret” And The Shifting Narrative Of Abortion Jurisprudence, Stacy A. Scaldo Mar 2013

Deadly Dicta: Roe’S “Unwanted Motherhood”, Gonzales’S “Women’S Regret” And The Shifting Narrative Of Abortion Jurisprudence, Stacy A. Scaldo

Stacy A Scaldo

For thirty-four years, the narrative of Supreme Court jurisprudence on the issue of abortion was firmly focused on the pregnant woman. From the initial finding that the right to an abortion stemmed from a constitutional right to privacy[1], through the test applied and refined to determine when that right was abridged[2], to the striking of statutes found to over-regulate that right[3], the conversation from the Court’s perspective maintained a singular focus. Pro-life arguments focusing on the fetus as the equal or greater party of interest were systematically pushed aside by the Court.[4] The consequences of an unwanted pregnancy, or as …


Eating Peas With One’S Fingers: A Semiotic Approach To Law And Social Norms, Bryan H. Druzin Feb 2013

Eating Peas With One’S Fingers: A Semiotic Approach To Law And Social Norms, Bryan H. Druzin

Bryan H. Druzin

This paper proposes a semiotic theory of norms—what I term normative semiotics. The paper’s central contention is that social norms are a language. Moreover, it is a language that we instinctively learn to speak. Normative behaviour is a mode of communication, the intelligibility of which allows us to establish cooperative relationships with others. Normative behaviour communicates an actor’s potential as a cooperative partner. Compliance with a norm is an act of communication: compliance signals cooperativeness; noncompliance signals uncooperativeness. An evolutionary model is proposed to explain how this comes about: evolution has generated an instinctual proficiency in working with these signals …


Legislative Regulation Of Surrogacy And Reproductive Technology, Marjorie Maguire Shultz Feb 2013

Legislative Regulation Of Surrogacy And Reproductive Technology, Marjorie Maguire Shultz

Marjorie M. Shultz

No abstract provided.


Relationships Of Representation In Voting Rights Act Jurisprudence, Kathryn Abrams Feb 2013

Relationships Of Representation In Voting Rights Act Jurisprudence, Kathryn Abrams

Kathryn Abrams

No abstract provided.


Legal Feminism And The Emotions: Three Moments In An Evolving Relationship, Kathryn Abrams Feb 2013

Legal Feminism And The Emotions: Three Moments In An Evolving Relationship, Kathryn Abrams

Kathryn Abrams

Examines the relationship between legal feminism and the emotions. Example of a narrative which connected women's emotional experiences with the operation of the law; Critique of emotion-based argumentation that women experienced in the law school classroom; Scholarship on law and emotions.


On Reading And Using The Tenth Amendment, Kathryn Abrams Feb 2013

On Reading And Using The Tenth Amendment, Kathryn Abrams

Kathryn Abrams

No abstract provided.


Legal Feminism And The Emotions: Three Moments In An Evolving Relationship, Kathryn Abrams Feb 2013

Legal Feminism And The Emotions: Three Moments In An Evolving Relationship, Kathryn Abrams

Kathryn Abrams

Examines the relationship between legal feminism and the emotions. Example of a narrative which connected women's emotional experiences with the operation of the law; Critique of emotion-based argumentation that women experienced in the law school classroom; Scholarship on law and emotions.


Render Unto Rawls: Law, Gospel, And The Evangelical Fallacy, Wayne R. Barnes Feb 2013

Render Unto Rawls: Law, Gospel, And The Evangelical Fallacy, Wayne R. Barnes

Wayne R. Barnes

There are many voices in American politics claiming that various candidates, laws and policies are necessitated by a “Christian” worldview. Many of these voices use explicit public rhetoric that their position is the one compelled by “Christian” principles. Although religious voices have been present in the United States since its founding, the volume and urgency of the voices seems to have increased dramatically in the last several decades, during the so-called “culture wars.” These voices famously come from the Christian Religious Right, advocating socially conservative laws on issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage. But there are also voices from …