Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (2)
- Law and Philosophy (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
-
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Cultural History (1)
- English Language and Literature (1)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (1)
- Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- History (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Legal (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Logic and Foundations of Mathematics (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Philosophy of Language (1)
- Philosophy of Mind (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Animal rights (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Blackstone (1)
-
- Civil liberties (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Conservatism (1)
- Constitutional home (1)
- Creativity (1)
- Fifth amendment (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Home (1)
- Intratextualism (1)
- Judicial decisionmaking (1)
- Judicial ideology (1)
- Law & culture (1)
- Law and humanities (1)
- Legal culture (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Legal personhood (1)
- Legal philosophy (1)
- Legal reasoning (1)
- Legal reform (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Rationality (1)
- Reverse polarity (1)
- Roberts Court (1)
- Rule of law (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Rules, Tricks And Emancipation, Jessie Allen
Rules, Tricks And Emancipation, Jessie Allen
Book Chapters
Rules and tricks are generally seen as different things. Rules produce order and control; tricks produce chaos. Rules help us predict how things will work out. Tricks are deceptive and transgressive, built to surprise us and confound our expectations in ways that can be entertaining or devastating. But rules can be tricky. General prohibitions and prescriptions generate surprising results in particular contexts. In some situations, a rule produces results that seem far from what the rule makers expected and antagonistic to the interests the rule is understood to promote. This contradictory aspect of rules is usually framed as a downside …
The Supreme Court’S Two Constitutions: A First Look At The “Reverse Polarity” Cases, Arthur D. Hellman
The Supreme Court’S Two Constitutions: A First Look At The “Reverse Polarity” Cases, Arthur D. Hellman
Articles
In the traditional approach to ideological classification, “liberal” judicial decisions are those that support civil liberties claims; “conservative” decisions are those that reject them. That view – particularly associated with the Warren Court era – is reflected in numerous academic writings and even an article by a prominent liberal judge. Today, however, there is mounting evidence that the traditional assumptions about the liberal-conservative divide are incorrect or at best incomplete. In at least some areas of constitutional law, the traditional characterizations have been reversed. Across a wide variety of constitutional issues, support for claims under the Bill of Rights or …
Intratextual And Intradoctrinal Dimensions Of The Constitutional Home, Gerald S. Dickinson
Intratextual And Intradoctrinal Dimensions Of The Constitutional Home, Gerald S. Dickinson
Articles
The home has been lifted to a special pantheon of rights and protections in American constitutional law. Until recently, a conception of special protections for the home in the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause was under-addressed by scholars. However, a contemporary and robust academic treatment of a home-centric takings doctrine merits a different approach to construction and interpretation: the intratextual and intradoctrinal implications of a coherent set of homebound protections across the Bill of Rights, including the Takings Clause.
Intratextualism and intradoctrinalism are interpretive methods of juxtaposing non-adjoining and adjoining clauses in the Constitution and Supreme Court doctrines to find patterns …