Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Economics (2)
- Judges (2)
- Law and Philosophy (2)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
-
- Communication (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- European Law (1)
- Industrial Organization (1)
- International Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Organizations Law (1)
- Political Economy (1)
- Speech and Rhetorical Studies (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Amsterdam Treaty (1)
- Article 65 (1)
- Civil judgments (1)
- Civil law systems (1)
- Competence (1)
-
- European Community Treaty (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal judicial self-restraint (1)
- Hague Conference on Private International Law (1)
- Hermeneutics (1)
- Judicial activism (1)
- Judicial cooperation (1)
- Judicial jurisdiction (1)
- Judicial philosophy (1)
- Judicial restraint (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Legal interpretation (1)
- Legal reasoning (1)
- Legislative process (1)
- Metaphor (1)
- Nonfoundationalism (1)
- Paul Ricoeur (1)
- Political process (1)
- Private international law (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- State courts (1)
- Theory of interpretation (1)
- Understanding (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Judicial Activism: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly, Arthur D. Hellman
Judicial Activism: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly, Arthur D. Hellman
Articles
No matter how judges are selected, sooner or later some unfortunate candidate will be labeled a "judicial activist." One has to wonder: Does the term have any identifiable core meaning? Or is it just an all-purpose term of opprobrium, reflecting whatever brand of judicial behavior the speaker regards as particularly pernicious? Implicit in this question are several important issues about the role of courts in our democratic society.
I take my definition from Judge Richard Posner, who describes activist decisions as those that expand judicial power over other branches of the national government or over state governments. Unlike other uses …
Can A Theory Of Interpretation Make A Difference?, George H. Taylor
Can A Theory Of Interpretation Make A Difference?, George H. Taylor
Articles
Can a theory of interpretation make a difference? The question has been posed most prominently by Judge Richard Posner, who, in recent work, has criticized the ability to make a difference of both theory writ large and of a theory of interpretation in particular. In other work I contend, contrary to Posner, that a theory of interpretation can make a difference at the level of methodology. Using the example of constitutional and statutory interpretation in law, I develop a theory that argues for the propriety and value of certain methods of interpretation over others. In the present essay, my concern …
Community Competence For Matters Of Judicial Cooperation At The Hague Conference On Private International Law: A View From The United States, Ronald A. Brand
Community Competence For Matters Of Judicial Cooperation At The Hague Conference On Private International Law: A View From The United States, Ronald A. Brand
Articles
The Amsterdam Treaty's introduction of Article 65 into the European Community Treaty took little time to achieve practical importance. In fact, the questions were practical as early as they were theoretical. A 1992 request by the United States that the Hague Conference on Private International Law negotiate a global convention on jurisdiction and the recognition of civil judgments resulted in a laboratory for the new-found competence of the Community. Thus, negotiations already underway--which included delegations from all 15 EU Member States--were affected significantly by the transfer of competence from those states to the Community institutions for matters under consideration at …