Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Philosophy (5)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
- Arts and Humanities (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
-
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (3)
- Philosophy (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- National Security Law (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Torts (1)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (7)
- Human Rights (3)
- Dworkin (2)
- Legal Theory (2)
- Anarchy (1)
-
- Appellate Courts (1)
- Bergson (1)
- Canada (1)
- Charter (1)
- Community (1)
- Constitutional adjudication (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional theory (1)
- Courts (1)
- Donoghue (1)
- Duty analysis (1)
- Dworkin, Ronald (1)
- Governance (1)
- Havel (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legal Positivism (1)
- Legal ethics--philosophy (1)
- Legal positivism (1)
- Legal positivism, natural law, naturalism, naturalistic jurisprudence, moral psychology (1)
- Legal theory (1)
- Legal validity (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Methodology, legal theory, legal history, legal realism, jurisprudence, positivism, natural law, Hobbes, Bentham, Austin, Hart (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- Neighbour principle (1)
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 28 of 28
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
The Next Revolution? Negligence Law For The 21st Century, Allan C. Hutchinson
The Next Revolution? Negligence Law For The 21st Century, Allan C. Hutchinson
Articles & Book Chapters
Donoghue’s neighbour is still the defining concept of Canadian tort law. Indeed, the whole history of modern negligence law can be reasonably understood as a concerted judicial effort to adapt and accommodate that principle to changing social, commercial and legal conditions. Now, 90 years later, it is perhaps time to recommend another revolution in negligence law. The Donoghue-inspired doctrine has done sterling work, but it is now weighed down with a bewildering range of conditions, clarifications and complications. When the duty analysis is complemented by other related requirements of causation and remoteness, the law of negligence has become something of …
Lloyd And The Legislative Void: Representative Actions In Transatlantic Context, Suzanne E. Chiodo
Lloyd And The Legislative Void: Representative Actions In Transatlantic Context, Suzanne E. Chiodo
All Papers
The Canadian class action regimes have had a strong influence on the development of collective redress procedures in England. Canadian class proceedings legislation provided a model for the competition law class action regime in the UK, and before then, it featured prominently in the Civil Justice Council’s report that recommended the enactment of generic class actions legislation in England. It is fitting, then, that the UK Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lloyd v Google referred to the Canadian jurisprudence on the representative rule, which allows one or more claimants to represent a group with the ‘same interest’. While Lloyd did …
Walking The Line: The Politics Of Federalism And Environmental Change, Allan C. Hutchinson
Walking The Line: The Politics Of Federalism And Environmental Change, Allan C. Hutchinson
Articles & Book Chapters
This short paper looks at the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act decision through a wider and more critical jurisprudential lens. In so doing, I demonstrate that the courts are no less political than legislatures in making decisions about who has the constitutional capacity to decide on how the challenges of climate change should be met. This is not so much a criticism of the Supreme Court of Canada, but an inevitable feature of constitutional law. After introducing the traditional and received explanation of the differences between political decision-making and judicial decision-making, I delve deeper into the Court's opinions and show …
The Myth Of Legal Realist Skepticism, Dan Priel
The Myth Of Legal Realist Skepticism, Dan Priel
All Papers
Here are some things everyone knows about the legal realists: They didn’t believe in legal rules, they thought—and demonstrated—that law is inherently indeterminate, and they taught us that it is the personality of the judge that decided cases. To the extent that they studied legal doctrine, it was in order to demonstrate its incoherence. This is why they “vociferously objected” to the Restatements. It is the victory of their ideas that killed the doctrinal legal treatise as a respectable form of scholarship in the United States. In addition to this jurisprudential radicalism, the legal realists were also politically radical. Their …
Religion, Public Law, And The Refuge Of Formalism, Howard Kislowicz, Benjamin Berger
Religion, Public Law, And The Refuge Of Formalism, Howard Kislowicz, Benjamin Berger
All Papers
In this article we suggest that the encounter with religious legal traditions has surfaced a distinct vein of formalism in Canadian public law, discernable across the Court’s law and religion jurisprudence. This is so despite the centrality of substantive analysis in the account Canadian public law gives of itself. But there are distinct challenges and a particular anxiety that surrounds the law-religion encounter; we argue that the fraught sovereignty and pluralism problems that this encounter presents has led Canadian public law to rediscover its formalist habits and the comfort that they bring.
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decisions in Wall …
Not Waiving, But Drowning: Supreme Court Of Canada Kills Waiver Of Tort As An Independent Cause Of Action, Suzanne E. Chiodo
Not Waiving, But Drowning: Supreme Court Of Canada Kills Waiver Of Tort As An Independent Cause Of Action, Suzanne E. Chiodo
Articles & Book Chapters
After decades of uncertainty in the area of class actions and tort law, waiver of tort is dead. In its decision in Atlantic Lottery Corp. v. Babstock,1 released on July 24, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") killed off the concept once and for all, holding that, "[t]his novel cause of action does not exist in Canadian law and has no reasonable chance of succeeding at trial. In addition, the term waiver of tort' is apt to generate confusion and should be abandoned."2 While the plaintiffs' claims in this case also included breach of contract and unjust enrichment, the …
Analytic Jurisprudence In Time, Dan Priel
Analytic Jurisprudence In Time, Dan Priel
Articles & Book Chapters
Friedrich Nietzsche had this to say about philosophers:
"You ask me which of the philosophers’ traits are really idiosyncrasies? For example, their lack of historical sense, their hatred of the very idea of becoming, their Egypticism. They think that they show their respect for a subject when they de-historicize it, sub specie aeterni – when they turn it into a mummy. All that philosophers have handled for thousands of years have been concept-mummies; nothing real escaped their grasp alive. When these honorable idolators of concept worship something, they kill it and stuff it; they threaten the life of everything they …
The Debate That Never Should Have Been: Dworkin, Hart, And The Analytical Project, Allan C. Hutchinson
The Debate That Never Should Have Been: Dworkin, Hart, And The Analytical Project, Allan C. Hutchinson
Articles & Book Chapters
As with most other things, the fortunes of jurisprudence ebb and flow. After an extended period of scholarly dominance, the past few years have witnessed a relative decline in its significance and prominence. This is no bad thing because jurisprudence has been trapped in an increasingly narrow debate characterized by its esoteric confines and analytical ambitions-what is the nature of law? There appeared to be a brief moment when other more expansive and less restrictive options for disciplinary development seemed possible. However, any reports of the demise of analytical jurisprudence now seem premature: the posthumous publication of a dated essay …
The Possibility Of Naturalistic Jurisprudence: Legal Positivism And Natural Law Theory Revisited, Dan Priel
The Possibility Of Naturalistic Jurisprudence: Legal Positivism And Natural Law Theory Revisited, Dan Priel
Articles & Book Chapters
Contemporary legal philosophy is predominantly anti-naturalistic. This is true of natural law theory, but also, more surprisingly, of legal positivism. Several prominent legal philosophers have in fact argued that the kind of questions that legal philosophers are interested in cannot be naturalized, such that a naturalistic legal philosophy is something of a contradiction in terms. Against the dominant view I argue that there are arguable naturalistic versions of both legal positivism and natural law. Much of the essay is dedicated to showing that such views are possible: I identify naturalistic versions of a “natural law” view, a “positivist” view, as …
Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Professionalism, And "Spikes" For Lawyers, Shelley Kierstead
Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Professionalism, And "Spikes" For Lawyers, Shelley Kierstead
Articles & Book Chapters
Lawyers, whether advocating in court, negotiating deals on clients’ behalf, or writing advice letters and briefs, use words to make a living. Their aim is to use these “words” to problem-solve for clients and to deliver an outcome the clients consider positive. In reality, however, there are times in each lawyer’s career when he or she is not able to help clients achieve the results the clients are looking for. When this occurs, lawyers must deliver “bad news” to the client. For the purposes of this article, I define “bad news” as being “any information which adversely and seriously affects …
Holmes's 'Path Of The Law' As Non-Analytic Jurisprudence, Dan Priel
Holmes's 'Path Of The Law' As Non-Analytic Jurisprudence, Dan Priel
Articles & Book Chapters
Despite being widely read and the source of numerous oft-cited aphorisms “The Path of the Law” remains elusive. To put the matter starkly: What is its thesis? Does it have one? How can we reconcile its matter-of-factly opening pages and its almost mystical conclusion? For some this was just proof that Holmes was a superficial and contradictory thinker; for others it suggested that “Path” should be read a series of interesting insights and arresting phrases, and nothing more. In this essay I suggest reading Holmes’s famous speech as an essay with a thesis about, well, the path of the law. …
Inventing Legal Combat: Pro-Poor 'Struggles' In The Human Rights Jurisprudence Of The Nigerian Appellate Courts, 1999-2011, Obiora Chinedu Okafor, Basil E. Ugochukwu
Inventing Legal Combat: Pro-Poor 'Struggles' In The Human Rights Jurisprudence Of The Nigerian Appellate Courts, 1999-2011, Obiora Chinedu Okafor, Basil E. Ugochukwu
Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series
This article deals with the question whether the jurisprudence of Nigeria’s appellate courts has helped advance or impede the struggles of the poor to assert their human rights in the country. The article begins by defining, delimiting, and situating the concepts “struggle” and “human rights as struggle.” It then moves on to identify and discuss the factors that make the struggles that the poor and the subaltern must wage to realize their human rights a tough one. Following this discussion, the article turns its attention to its main focus, i.e., an analytical examination of the ways in which the corpus …
Poverty In The Human Rights Jurisprudence Of The Nigerian Appellate Courts (1999-2011), Obiora C. Okafor, Basil E. Ugochukwu
Poverty In The Human Rights Jurisprudence Of The Nigerian Appellate Courts (1999-2011), Obiora C. Okafor, Basil E. Ugochukwu
Articles & Book Chapters
The major objective of this article is to examine the extent to which the human rights jurisprudence of the Nigerian appellate courts has been sensitive and/or receptive to the socio-economic and political claims of Nigeria’s large population of the poor and marginalized. In particular, the article considers: the extent to which Nigerian human rights jurisprudence has either facilitated or hindered the efforts of the poor to ameliorate their own poverty; the kinds of conceptual apparatuses and analyses utilized by the Nigerian courts in examining the issues brought before it that concerned the specific conditions of the poor; and the key …
Common Law Property Theory And Jurisprudence In Canada, Sarah E. Hamill
Common Law Property Theory And Jurisprudence In Canada, Sarah E. Hamill
Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series
In recent years, property theorists have offered varying accounts as to what exactly ownership is, typically focusing on one or more key rights to the owned thing. However, most of these theories are articulated in the abstract and do not engage the jurisprudence. This article uses the jurisprudence concerning expropriation and adverse possession to show that Canadian courts have in fact developed their own definition of ownership — one that is not reflected in the property theory discourse. The author goes on to argue that this narrower definition of ownership — made up by the rights to exclude and to …
Jurisprudence And (Its) History, Dan Priel, Charles L. Barzun
Jurisprudence And (Its) History, Dan Priel, Charles L. Barzun
Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series
It is not obvious that philosophers and historians of law should take much interest in the scholarly enterprises of the other. Many legal philosophers understand their task as one of clarifying the meaning of such familiar legal concepts as “right,” “duty,” or “law” by offering analyses of them that purport to be general, abstract, and timeless. Meanwhile, historians tend to be suspicious of speculative claims ungrounded in fact and so often prefer to focus on the concrete, particular features of actual legal regimes.
But surface appearances can deceive. Unlike some other areas of philosophy, the subject matter of jurisprudence is …
The Liabilities Of Sureties, Daniel P. Cipollone
The Liabilities Of Sureties, Daniel P. Cipollone
Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series
This paper provides an overview of when a surety may be released from his or her obligations under a guarantee following a material variation to the principal lending contract. Part I frames the overall discussion by reviewing the role and importance of guarantees in contemporary commerce, outlining the central tenets of guarantee obligations, and distinguishing them as a subset of indemnities. Part II reviews how sureties have traditionally enjoyed a favoured status at law as well as what, in law, is considered to constitute a material variation. Part III introduces and sets out a longstanding rule governing the liability of …
The Place Of Legitimacy In Legal Theory, Dan Priel
The Place Of Legitimacy In Legal Theory, Dan Priel
Articles & Book Chapters
In this essay I argue that in order to understand debates in jurisprudence one needs to distinguish clearly between four concepts: validity, content, normativity, and legitimacy. I show that this distinction helps us, first, make sense of fundamental debates in jurisprudence between legal positivists and Dworkin: these should not be understood, as they often are, as debates on the conditions of validity, but rather as debates on the right way of understanding the relationship between these four concepts. I then use this distinction between the four concepts to criticize legal positivism. The positivist account begins with an attempt to explain …
The Intelligibility Of Extralegal State Action: A General Lesson For Debates On Public Emergencies And Legality, François Tanguay-Renaud
The Intelligibility Of Extralegal State Action: A General Lesson For Debates On Public Emergencies And Legality, François Tanguay-Renaud
Articles & Book Chapters
Some legal theorists deny that states can conceivably act extralegally in the sense of acting contrary to domestic law. This position finds its most robust articulation in the writings of Hans Kelsen and has more recently been taken up by David Dyzenhaus in the context of his work on emergencies and legality. This paper seeks to demystify their arguments and ultimately contend that we can intelligibly speak of the state as a legal wrongdoer or a legally unauthorized actor.
"Everybody Knows What A Picket Line Means": Picketing Before The British Columbia Court Of Appeal, Judy Fudge, Eric Tucker
"Everybody Knows What A Picket Line Means": Picketing Before The British Columbia Court Of Appeal, Judy Fudge, Eric Tucker
Articles & Book Chapters
The general hostility of courts towards workers’ collective action is well documented, but even against that standard the restrictive approach of the British Columbia Court of Appeal stands out. Although this trend first became apparent in a series of cases before World War II in which the court treated peaceful picketing as unlawful and narrowly interpreted British Columbia’s Trade Union Act (1902), which limited trade unions’ common law liability, this study will focus on the court’s post-War jurisprudence. The legal environment for trade union activity was radically altered during World War II by PC 1003, which provided unions with a …
Wrestling With Punishment: The Role Of The Bc Court Of Appeal In The Law Of Sentencing, Benjamin Berger, Gerry Ferguson
Wrestling With Punishment: The Role Of The Bc Court Of Appeal In The Law Of Sentencing, Benjamin Berger, Gerry Ferguson
Articles & Book Chapters
This article, one in a collection of articles on the history and jurisprudential contributions of the British Columbia Court of Appeal on the occasion of its 100th anniversary, looks at the role and the work of the court in the area of sentencing since the court was first given jurisdiction to hear sentence appeals in 1921. In the three broad periods that we canvass, we draw out the sometimes surprising, often unique, and frequently provocative ways in which the BCCA has, over its history, wrestled with the practice of criminal punishment and, with it, the basic assumptions of our system …
Book Review: Justice In Robes By Ronald Dworkin (2006), Dan Priel
Book Review: Justice In Robes By Ronald Dworkin (2006), Dan Priel
All Papers
Since the 1960's Ronald Dworkin has been arguing for a particular account of law that he believed was both explanatorily superior to the one offered by competing theories, and also the basis for normative arguments for producing right answers to legal questions. Justice in Robes collects Dworkin's most recent essays on this subject and thus provides the appropriate opportunity for assessing the legal theory of one of the more influential legal philosophers. In this Review I seek to offer a clearer account than appears in the book itself of Dworkin's project, and in this way offer a measured assessment of …
Governance And Anarchy In The S.2(B) Jurisprudence: A Comment On Vancouver Sun And Harper V. Canada, Jamie Cameron
Governance And Anarchy In The S.2(B) Jurisprudence: A Comment On Vancouver Sun And Harper V. Canada, Jamie Cameron
Articles & Book Chapters
The article identifies and explains a double standard in the Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence. The contrast is between the open court jurisprudence, which is a model of good constitutional governance – or principled decision making – and the Court’s s.2(b) methodology, which is “anarchistic” or capricious and undisciplined, in the sense of this article. Two landmark cases decided in 2004 illustrate the double standard: the first is Re Vancouver Sun, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 332, which dealt with the open court principle under Parliament’s anti-terrorism provision for investigative hearings, it represents a high water mark for open court and s.2(b) …
The Amazing Three-Headed Limited Partner: Reflections On Old Loopholes And New Jurisprudence, Lisa Philipps
The Amazing Three-Headed Limited Partner: Reflections On Old Loopholes And New Jurisprudence, Lisa Philipps
Articles & Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
Transcending Community: Some Thoughts On Havel And Bergson, Brian Slattery
Transcending Community: Some Thoughts On Havel And Bergson, Brian Slattery
Articles & Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
The Myth Of Retributive Justice, Brian Slattery
The Myth Of Retributive Justice, Brian Slattery
Articles & Book Chapters
In fairy tales, villains usually come to a bad end, snared in a trap of their own making, or visited with a disaster nicely suited to their particular villainy. Read a story of this kind to children and you will be struck by the profound satisfaction with which this predictable of events is greeted. Yet, if children cheer when the villain is done in, they are just as satisfied when the hero manages to get the villain by the throat but takes pity and spares him. These tales of retribution and mercy, even reduced to their barest bones, seem to …
The Last Emperor?, Allan C. Hutchinson
Rights, Communities, And Tradition, Brian Slattery
Rights, Communities, And Tradition, Brian Slattery
Articles & Book Chapters
This paper argues that there is a close connection between basic human rights and communal bonds. It criticizes the philosophical views of Alan Gewirth and Alasdair MacIntyre, which in differing ways deny this connection.
Are Constitutional Cases Political?, Brian Slattery
Are Constitutional Cases Political?, Brian Slattery
Articles & Book Chapters
To argue that constitutional adjudication is political does not carry us very far unless we go on to specify what the pursuit of politics entails, the goals it seeks to attain, and the basic principles informing its practice. The word political has no clearly defined meaning in modern usage. Rather, it has the chameleon-like capacity to change colours so as to blend with a variety of different conceptual backgrounds. Of course, if we adopt an Aristotelian notion of politics as the pursuit of the common good of a community and the individual goods of its members, we can agree that …