Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- CAFC (2)
- Federal Circuit (2)
- Judicial Review (2)
- PTO (2)
- USPTO (2)
-
- 35 U.S.C. § 102 (1)
- 35 U.S.C. § 271(e) (1)
- A History of Anglo-American Intellectual Property (1)
- AIA (1)
- Alexander Bickel's Appeal (1)
- Alpheus T. Mason (1)
- America Invents Act (1)
- American Liberals (1)
- Ariad pharmaceuticals v. eli lilly & Co. (1)
- Bayh-Dole Act (1)
- Becton Dickinson & Co. (1)
- Bilski v. Kappos (1)
- Biography (1)
- Bonito Boats (1)
- Book Review (1)
- Brett Frischmann (1)
- CCPA (1)
- Christianson v. Colt Indus. (1)
- Colleen Chien (1)
- Constitutional Interpretations (1)
- Constitutional law -- United States (1)
- Constitutional review; judicial review; constitutional court; supreme court; comparative constitutionalism; comparative law (1)
- Corporate Law (1)
- Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (1)
- Courts (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Classifying Systems Of Constitutional Review: A Context-Specific Analysis, Samantha Lalisan
Classifying Systems Of Constitutional Review: A Context-Specific Analysis, Samantha Lalisan
Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design
Modern constitutional drafters and advisors increasingly use judicial review classifications and the current model for classification does not accurately capture constitutional review in Latin America. This paper proposes context-specific classification that can accurately capture constitutional review in the Latin American region. Specifically, this paper argues that the context-specific analysis suggests that the more salient point of classification in Latin America is that of access mechanisms to constitutional courts. As such, the paper proceeds in four parts: Part I examines the traditional model of classification in Europe and focuses on the Spanish and German direct access mechanisms. Part II explores the …
Reevaluating Politicized Identity & Notions Of An American Political Community In The Legal & Political Process, Marvin L. Astrada Jd, Phd
Reevaluating Politicized Identity & Notions Of An American Political Community In The Legal & Political Process, Marvin L. Astrada Jd, Phd
Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality
No abstract provided.
Sticks, Stones, And So-Called Judges: Why The Era Of Trump Necessitates Revisiting Presidential Influence On The Courts, Quinn W. Crowley
Sticks, Stones, And So-Called Judges: Why The Era Of Trump Necessitates Revisiting Presidential Influence On The Courts, Quinn W. Crowley
Indiana Law Journal
This Note will be primarily divided into three main sections. Part I of this Note will begin by discussing the importance of judicial independence in modern society and the role of elected officials in shaping the public perception of the courts. Additionally, as problems of judicial legitimacy are age-old and date back to America’s founding, Part I will include a brief discussion of an early clash between President Thomas Jefferson and the courts.
Parts II and III of this Note will seek to place President Trump’s conduct towards the judicial branch within the proper historical context. Part II examines the …
Dissenting State Patent Regimes, Camilla A. Hrdy
Explaining The Supreme Court's Interest In Patent Law, Timothy R. Holbrook
Explaining The Supreme Court's Interest In Patent Law, Timothy R. Holbrook
IP Theory
No abstract provided.
Law & Politics: The Case Against Judicial Review Of Direct Democracy, Corey A. Johanningmeier
Law & Politics: The Case Against Judicial Review Of Direct Democracy, Corey A. Johanningmeier
Indiana Law Journal
This Note argues against strong judicial review of direct democracy. Judicial review has been the dominant answer in legal scholarship for the perceived danger of majoritarian tyranny in any democratic system. But Progressive movements throughout American history, as well as a growing number of respected law professors, have questioned the assumption that courts or even legislatures are better protectors of discrete and insular minorities than the rights-respecting populace. Although the vast majority of legal scholarship still displays a crippling cynicism about popular competence, this view cannot continue to block progressives from participating in initiative campaigns. Exclusive resort to elitist procedural …
American Liberals And Judicial Activism: Alexander Bickel's Appeal From The New To The Old, Maurice J. Holland
American Liberals And Judicial Activism: Alexander Bickel's Appeal From The New To The Old, Maurice J. Holland
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
In Quest Of Freedom: American Political Thought And Practice, By Alpheus T. Mason And Richard H. Leach; The Supreme Court In A Free Society, By Alpheus T. Mason And William M. Beaney, Charles S. Hyneman
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.