Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Commercial Law (3)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- International Law (2)
-
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Transnational Law (2)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- European Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Other Law (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Rule of Law (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Keyword
-
- Annual Reports (1)
- Authority (1)
- BRRD (1)
- Bank resolution (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
-
- Bankruptcy Law; Stern v. Marshall; Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison; Wellness International Network; Ltd. V. Sharif; Supreme Court; Federal Bankruptcy Rule 7012(b); Balancing test; Core claims and non-core claims; Jurisdiction; Competency; Implied consent; Federal Judgeship Act of 1984; Non-Article III Courts; Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.; Statutory authority; Counterclaims; Adjuncts of district courts; Stern Claim; Stern Gap; Intermediary claims; Knowing and voluntary; Legislative history; Private or Public rights (1)
- Bespeak Caution (1)
- Bespeaks Caution Doctrine (1)
- Book review (1)
- Chris Brummer (1)
- Delegation (1)
- Disclosures (1)
- EBA (1)
- ECJ (1)
- EU (1)
- Enforcement powers (1)
- European Banking Authority (1)
- European Commission (1)
- European Court of Justice (1)
- European Union (1)
- FCPA (1)
- Financial engineering (1)
- Foreign Law (1)
- Forward-Looking Statements (1)
- Global economic diplomacy (1)
- Global economic system (1)
- Global financial crisis (1)
- Global trade (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- In re ESpeed Inc. Securities Litigation (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Understanding Wellness International Network, Ltd. V. Sharif: The Problems With Allowing Parties To Impliedly Consent To Bankruptcy Court Adjudication Of Stern Claims, Elizabeth Jackson
Understanding Wellness International Network, Ltd. V. Sharif: The Problems With Allowing Parties To Impliedly Consent To Bankruptcy Court Adjudication Of Stern Claims, Elizabeth Jackson
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
The 2011 Supreme Court case Stern v. Marshall defined which claims bankruptcy courts had the authority to adjudicate, but it’s complicated holding left lower courts perplexed. Specifically, the Stern decision created “Stern claims”—claims that bankruptcy courts have the statutory, but not the constitutional, authority to adjudicate. Subsequent cases, such as Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison and Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, have grappled with whether Stern claims should be treated as “core” claims, which bankruptcy courts can enter final judgments on, or “non-core” claims, which bankruptcy courts can only enter final judgments on if the litigating parties consent. …
A Cautionary Look At A Cautionary Doctrine, Andrew W. Fine
A Cautionary Look At A Cautionary Doctrine, Andrew W. Fine
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Optimism is an indispensable element of effective salesmanship. It is therefore quite natural for the directors of public companies to want to optimistically tout the potential long-term benefits of investing in their companies. After all, directors of public companies must be empowered to attract the attention and money of American investors. But what happens if these long-term projections fail to come true? Who is to blame for long-term projections that are simply unrealistic? A doctrine called the “bespeaks caution” doctrine has emerged in order to govern these inquiries, and holds that these optimistic forward-looking statements are legally immunized provided that …
Confounding Ockham's Razor: Minilateralism And International Economic Regulation, Eric C. Chaffee
Confounding Ockham's Razor: Minilateralism And International Economic Regulation, Eric C. Chaffee
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
In Minilateralism: How Trade Alliances, Soft Law, and Financial Engineering Are Redefining Economic Statecraft, Professor Chris Brummer embraces the complexity of the global economic system and its regulation by exploring the emerging role and dominance of varying strands of economic collaboration and regulation that he collectively refers to as “minilateralism.” In describing the turn toward minilateralism, Brummer notes a number of key features of this new minilateral system, including a shift away from global cooperation to strategic alliances composed of the smallest group necessary to achieve a particular goal, a turn from formal treaties to informal non-binding accords and other …
Regulatory Incentive Realignment And The Eu Legal Framework Of Bank Resolution, Andromachi Georgosouli
Regulatory Incentive Realignment And The Eu Legal Framework Of Bank Resolution, Andromachi Georgosouli
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Risks associated with incentive misalignment are liable to seriously jeopardize the effectiveness of bank resolution, when not properly contained. This Article considers the management of misaligned incentives between regulators that are found in a vertical relationship of public governance. Using the EU legal framework of bank resolution as its case study, this Article explores the effectiveness of the quasi-enforcement powers of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and, where relevant, of the European Banking Authority (EBA) as an incentive realignment legal technique. Two principal difficulties are identified: on the one hand, the problematic interinstitutional dynamic of the SRB and the EBA …