Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Anthropology (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
-
- Cognitive Psychology (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Other Anthropology (1)
- Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation (1)
- Policy History, Theory, and Methods (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Rhetoric (1)
- Rhetoric and Composition (1)
- Theory and Philosophy (1)
- Institution
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
The Empty Idea Of “Equality Of Creditors”, David A. Skeel Jr.
The Empty Idea Of “Equality Of Creditors”, David A. Skeel Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
For two hundred years, the equality of creditors norm—the idea that similarly situated creditors should be treated similarly—has been widely viewed as the most important principle in American bankruptcy law, rivaled only by our commitment to a fresh start for honest but unfortunate debtors. I argue in this Article that the accolades are misplaced. Although the equality norm once was a rough proxy for legitimate concerns, such as curbing self-dealing, it no longer plays this role. Nor does it serve any other beneficial purpose.
Part I of this Article traces the historical emergence and evolution of the equality norm, first …
Doctrinal Reasoning As A Disruptive Practice, Jessie Allen
Doctrinal Reasoning As A Disruptive Practice, Jessie Allen
Articles
Legal doctrine is generally thought to contribute to legal decision making only to the extent it determines substantive results. Yet in many cases, the available authorities are indeterminate. I propose a different model for how doctrinal reasoning might contribute to judicial decisions. Drawing on performance theory and psychological studies of readers, I argue that judges’ engagement with formal legal doctrine might have self-disrupting effects like those performers experience when they adopt uncharacteristic behaviors. Such disruptive effects would not explain how judges ultimately select, or should select, legal results. But they might help legal decision makers to set aside subjective biases.