Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Attorney General; Prosecutorial Discretion (1)
- Brown (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Cognitive development (1)
- Criminal law (1)
-
- Desegregation (1)
- Developmental Neuroscience (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Egalitarianism (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Juvenile commitment (1)
- Juvenile court (1)
- Juvenile delinquency court (1)
- Juvenile law (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Political violence (1)
- Republicanism (1)
- Rogers Smith (1)
- Separate but equal (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- The Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
A Lit Stick Of Dynamite: The Story Of Desegregation In Clinton, Tennessee, Johnny Cerisano
A Lit Stick Of Dynamite: The Story Of Desegregation In Clinton, Tennessee, Johnny Cerisano
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Erosion Of The Rule Of Law When A State Attorney General Refuses To Defend The Constitutionality Of Controversial Laws, Rena M. Lindevaldsen
The Erosion Of The Rule Of Law When A State Attorney General Refuses To Defend The Constitutionality Of Controversial Laws, Rena M. Lindevaldsen
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Eighth Amendment Analysis Of Statutes Allowing Or Mandating Transfer Of Juvenile Offenders To Adult Criminal Court In Light Of The Supreme Court's Recent Jurisprudence Recognizing Developmental Neuroscience, Katherine I. Puzone
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
E Pluribus Unum: Liberalism's March To Be The Singular Influence On Civil Rights At The Supreme Court, Aaron J. Shuler
E Pluribus Unum: Liberalism's March To Be The Singular Influence On Civil Rights At The Supreme Court, Aaron J. Shuler
Barry Law Review
This article seeks to apply Rogers Smith’s Multiple Traditions thesis to the United States Supreme Court’s treatment of the Fourteenth Amendment to uncover the influences behind its major civil rights decisions. It will argue that liberalism dominates at the Court after mostly, but not completely, shedding its illiberal tendencies. This article will argue that the Court’s focus on intent over impact and its “color-blind” approach to racial classifications in the era of subterranean prejudice and indifference or ignorance to inequality solidifies and perpetuates the hierarchies created by ascriptive forms of Americanism under the Court’s liberal notions. This article will also …