Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- BLM (1)
- Contract interpretation (1)
- Department of Interior (1)
- Duty to dispose (1)
- Enclave Clause (1)
-
- Equal Footing Doctrine (1)
- Euclid v. Ambler (1)
- FLPMA (1)
- Federal ownership (1)
- Federalism (1)
- H.B. 148 (1)
- Land disposal (1)
- Natural resources management (1)
- Planning (1)
- Precedent (1)
- Progressivism (1)
- Property Clause (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Property, Administrative, and Natural Resources & Environmental Law (1)
- Public lands (1)
- Regulatory Takings (1)
- Transfer of Public Lands Act (1)
- Utah (1)
- Utah Enabling Act (1)
- Zoning (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Yes, Thankfully, Euclid Lives, Charles M. Haara, Michael Allan Wolf
Yes, Thankfully, Euclid Lives, Charles M. Haara, Michael Allan Wolf
Michael A Wolf
Professors Haar and Wolf reiterate their endorsement of Progressive jurisprudence, as embodied in the Supreme Court's opinion in Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., despite Professor Eric Claeys's effort to expose the political theory underlying Progressive legal thought. They highlight problems with Professor Claeys's portrayal of the actual practice of zoning and with his use of history, problems that seriously undercut Professor Claeys's findings regarding the political beliefs of early zoning and planning advocates, the evolution of zoning law in the courts, and the role natural law played in American legal history.
Public Lands And The Federal Government’S Compact-Based “Duty To Dispose”: A Case Study Of Utah’S H.B. 148 – The Transfer Of Public Lands Act, Donald J. Kochan
Public Lands And The Federal Government’S Compact-Based “Duty To Dispose”: A Case Study Of Utah’S H.B. 148 – The Transfer Of Public Lands Act, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
Recent legislation passed in March 2012 in the State of Utah — the “Transfer of Public Lands Act and Related Study,” (“TPLA”) also commonly referred to as House Bill 148 (“H.B. 148”) — has demanded that the federal government, by December 31, 2014, “extinguish title” to certain public lands that the federal government currently holds (totaling an estimated more than 20 million acres). It also calls for the transfer of such acreage to the State and establishes procedures for the development of a management regime for this increased state portfolio of land holdings resulting from the transfer. The State of …