Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Articles (4)
- 1983 (2)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Qualified immunity (2)
-
- Access to information (1)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (1)
- Bivens (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Discovery (1)
- FRAP 32.1 (1)
- Facts (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal rules of appellate procedure (1)
- Information (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Particularity (1)
- Pearson v. Callahan (1)
- Plausibility (1)
- Pleading (1)
- Pleadings (1)
- Precedent (1)
- Probability (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Sufficiency (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Unpublished (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Book Review. Joan Biskupic, An American Original: The Life And Constitution Of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Book Review. Joan Biskupic, An American Original: The Life And Constitution Of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Faculty Publications and Presentations
No abstract provided.
Marbury V. Madison And The Foundation Of Law, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Marbury V. Madison And The Foundation Of Law, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Faculty Publications and Presentations
No abstract provided.
Clear As Mud: How The Uncertain Precedential Status Of Unpublished Opinions Muddles Qualified Immunity Determinations, David R. Cleveland
Clear As Mud: How The Uncertain Precedential Status Of Unpublished Opinions Muddles Qualified Immunity Determinations, David R. Cleveland
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Pearson, Iqbal, And Procedural Judicial Activism, Goutam U. Jois
Pearson, Iqbal, And Procedural Judicial Activism, Goutam U. Jois
Goutam U Jois
In its most recent term, the Supreme Court decided Pearson v. Callahan and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, two cases that, even at this early date, can safely be called “game-changers.” What is fairly well known is that Iqbal and Pearson, on their own terms, will hurt civil rights plaintiffs. A point that has not been explored is how the interaction between Iqbal and Pearson will also hurt civil rights plaintiffs. First, the cases threaten to catch plaintiffs on the horns of a dilemma: Iqbal says, in effect, that greater detail is required to get allegations past the motion to dismiss stage. …
Marbury V. Madison And The Foundation Of Law, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Marbury V. Madison And The Foundation Of Law, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Jeffrey C. Tuomala
No abstract provided.
Book Review. Joan Biskupic, An American Original: The Life And Constitution Of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Book Review. Joan Biskupic, An American Original: The Life And Constitution Of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Jeffrey C. Tuomala
No abstract provided.
Everyone Knows Medellin; Has Anyone Heard Of O'Brien? Reconciling The United States And The International Community By Amending The Vccr, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 817 (2010), Steven M. Novak
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
New Pleading, New Discovery, Scott Dodson
New Pleading, New Discovery, Scott Dodson
Michigan Law Review
Pleading in federal court has a new narrative. The old narrative was one of notice, with the goal of broad access to the civil justice system. New Pleading, after the landmark Supreme Court cases of Twombly and Iqbal, is focused on factual sufficiency, with the purpose of screening out meritless cases that otherwise might impose discovery costs on defendants. The problem with New Pleading is that factual insufficiency often is a poor proxy for meritlessness. Some plaintifs lack sufficient factual knowledge of the elements of their claims not because the claims lack merit but because the information they need is …
Foreword: Procedure As Palimpsest, Catherine T. Struve
Foreword: Procedure As Palimpsest, Catherine T. Struve
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.