Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- And Economic Stability Act; Detroit; Puerto Rico; Municipal Bankruptcy; Federalism; (1)
- Bankruptcy Law; Bankruptcy Code; Chapter 11; Chapter 7; Chapter 9; Public Law; Judge; Judging; Structural Reform; Constitution; Constitutional Law; Private Law; Debtor; Creditor; PROMESA; Puerto Rico Oversight (1)
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Clean Power Plan; Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction; Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants; Target Reduction Rates; Administrative Deference; International Climate Change Efforts; Economic Ramifications; Utility Rates; Electric Grid Reliability; Chevron Deference; UARG v. EPA; Michigan v. EPA; Interim Target Goals; Flexible Regulations; Compliance Formula; Endangerment Finding; Section 111(D) of the Clean Air Act; Legislative Intent; "Appropriate and Necessary" Standard; Costs of Implementation; "Tailpipe Rule"; Health Benefits (1)
- Management (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Towards A Jurisprudence Of Public Law Bankruptcy Judging, Edward J. Janger
Towards A Jurisprudence Of Public Law Bankruptcy Judging, Edward J. Janger
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
In this essay Professor Janger considers the role of bankruptcy judges in Chapter 9 cases in light of the scholarly literature on public law judging. He explores the extent to which bankruptcy judges engaged in the fiscal restructuring of a municipality use tools, and face constraints, similar to those utilized by federal district court judges in structural reform cases, where constitutional norms are at issue.
The Legal Climate On Climate Change: The Fate Of The Epa's Clean Power Plan After Michigan And Uarg, Israel Katz
The Legal Climate On Climate Change: The Fate Of The Epa's Clean Power Plan After Michigan And Uarg, Israel Katz
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
One of the centerpieces of the United States’ effort to combat climate change is the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) controversial Clean Power Plan, which consists of the first-ever federal regulations requiring states to achieve massive carbon dioxide emissions reductions from existing fossil fuel-fired power plants. The regulations operate by setting interim and final emissions target dates for states to ultimately reach an aggregate 32% reduction in carbon emissions by the year 2030. This Note argues that the current regulations will not survive judicial scrutiny, because the U.S. Supreme Court has moved away from traditional administrative deference in instances where an …