Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (2)
- Authorship (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Civil rights law (1)
- Community views (1)
-
- Conceptual & rhetorical framing (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Craig Konnoth (1)
- Crime-control utilitarians (1)
- Dignity (1)
- Disparate-impact doctrine (1)
- Distributive principles of criminal liability (1)
- Empirical and deontological desert (1)
- Empirical studies (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Equity (1)
- Experimental philosophy (1)
- General deterrence (1)
- Harm (1)
- Health law (1)
- Health policy (1)
- Incapacitation of the dangerous (1)
- Individual vs. structural remedies (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Intuitions of justice (1)
- Labor & employment (1)
- Medicalization (1)
- Policy feedback (1)
- Privacy (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Pursuing Diversity: From Education To Employment, Amy L. Wax
Pursuing Diversity: From Education To Employment, Amy L. Wax
All Faculty Scholarship
A central pillar of the Supreme Court’s educational affirmative-action jurisprudence is that the pedagogical benefits of being educated with students from diverse backgrounds are sufficiently “compelling” to justify some degree of race-conscious selection in university admissions.
This essay argues that the blanket permission to advance educational diversity, defensible or not, should not be extended to employment. The purpose of the workplace is not pedagogical. Rather, employees are hired and paid to do a job, deliver a service, produce a product, and complete specified tasks efficiently and effectively. Whether race-conscious practices for the purpose of creating a more diverse workforce will …
A Truce In Criminal Law's Distributive Principle Wars?, Paul H. Robinson
A Truce In Criminal Law's Distributive Principle Wars?, Paul H. Robinson
All Faculty Scholarship
Crime-control utilitarians and retributivist philosophers have long been at war over the appropriate distributive principle for criminal liability and punishment, with little apparent possibility of reconciliation between the two. In the utilitarians’ view, the imposition of punishment can be justified only by the practical benefit that it provides: avoiding future crime. In the retributivists’ view, doing justice for past wrongs is a value in itself that requires no further justification. The competing approaches simply use different currencies: fighting future crime versus doing justice for past wrongs.
It is argued here that the two are in fact reconcilable, in a fashion. …
How Medicalization Of Civil Rights Could Disappoint, Allison K. Hoffman
How Medicalization Of Civil Rights Could Disappoint, Allison K. Hoffman
All Faculty Scholarship
This essay reflects on Craig Konnoth’s recent Article, Medicalization and the New Civil Rights, which is a carefully crafted and thought-provoking description of the refashioning of civil rights claims into medical rights frameworks. He compellingly threads together many intellectual traditions—from antidiscrimination law to disability law to health law—to illustrate the pervasiveness of the phenomenon that he describes and why it might be productive as a tool to advance civil rights.
This response, however, offers several reasons why medicalization may not cure all that ails civil rights litigation’s pains and elaborates on the potential risks of overinvesting in medical rights-seeking. …
Privative Copyright, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
Privative Copyright, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
All Faculty Scholarship
“Privative” copyright claims are infringement actions brought by authors for the unauthorized public dissemination of works that are private, unpublished, and revelatory of the author’s personal identity. Driven by considerations of authorial autonomy, dignity, and personality rather than monetary value, these claims are almost as old as Anglo-American copyright law itself. Yet modern thinking has attempted to undermine their place within copyright law and sought to move them into the domain of privacy law. This Article challenges the dominant view and argues that privative copyright claims form a legitimate part of the copyright landscape. It shows how privative copyright claims …