Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Brandenburg (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Clear and Present Danger (1)
- Common law (1)
- Contemporary judicial morality (1)
-
- Ethical conduct (1)
- Fairness Doctrine (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free Speech (1)
- Government Suppression (1)
- Hate Speech (1)
- Impartiality (1)
- Incitement (1)
- John Stuart Mill (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial decision-making (1)
- Judicial ethical code (1)
- Judicial ethics (1)
- Judicial fairness (1)
- Judicial impartiality (1)
- Judicial morality (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Juries (1)
- Jurist (1)
- Jury (1)
- Justice (1)
- Morality (1)
- Pennsylvania (1)
- Procedure (1)
- Recusal (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Mirror, Mirror, On The Wall—Biased Impartiality, Appearances, And The Need For Recusal Reform, Zygmont A. Pines
Mirror, Mirror, On The Wall—Biased Impartiality, Appearances, And The Need For Recusal Reform, Zygmont A. Pines
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
The article focuses on a troubling aspect of contemporary judicial morality.
Impartiality—and the appearance of impartiality—are the foundation of judicial decision-making, judicial morality, and the public’s trust in the rule of law. Recusal, in which a jurist voluntarily removes himself or herself from participating in a case, is a process that attempts to preserve and promote the substance and the appearance of judicial impartiality. Nevertheless, the traditional common law recusal process, prevalent in many of our state court systems, manifestly subverts basic legal and ethical norms.
Today’s recusal practice—whether rooted in unintentional hypocrisy, wishful thinking, or a pathological cognitive dissonance— …
Whose Market Is It Anyway? A Philosophy And Law Critique Of The Supreme Court’S Free-Speech Absolutism, Spencer Bradley
Whose Market Is It Anyway? A Philosophy And Law Critique Of The Supreme Court’S Free-Speech Absolutism, Spencer Bradley
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In the wake of Charlottesville, the rise of the alt-right, and campus controversies, the First Amendment has fallen into public scrutiny. Historically, the First Amendment’s “marketplace of ideas” has been a driving source of American political identity; since Brandenburg v. Ohio, the First Amendment protects all speech from government interference unless it causes incitement. The marketplace of ideas allows for the good and the bad ideas to enter American society and ultimately allows the people to decide their own course.
Yet, is the First Amendment truly a tool of social progress? Initially, the First Amendment curtailed war-time dissidents and …