Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Civil society (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Collaborative Community-based Natural Resource Management (1)
- Conservation (1)
-
- Copenhagen (1)
- Custodial interrogation (1)
- Environmental Movements (1)
- Environmental justice (1)
- Good governance (1)
- Intercollegiate athletes (1)
- Miranda (1)
- NCAA (1)
- NGOs (1)
- Non-State Actor (1)
- Poverty (1)
- Privilege against self-incrimination (1)
- Public Participation (1)
- Right of Publicity (1)
- Seattle (1)
- Sustainable Development (1)
- Traffic stop (1)
- UNFCCC (1)
- United Nations (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Collaborative Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Prof. Elizabeth Burleson
Collaborative Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Prof. Elizabeth Burleson
Prof. Elizabeth Burleson
This article analyzes the importance of increasing civil society actor access to and influence in international legal and policy negotiations, drawing from academic scholarship on governance, conservation and environmental sustainability, natural resource management, observations of civil society actors, and the authors’ experiences as participants in international environmental negotiations.
Strange Bedfellows: How The Ncaa And Ea Sports May Have Violated Antitrust And Right Of Publicity Laws To Make A Profit At The Exploitation Of Intercollegiate Amateurism, Andrew B. Carrabis
Strange Bedfellows: How The Ncaa And Ea Sports May Have Violated Antitrust And Right Of Publicity Laws To Make A Profit At The Exploitation Of Intercollegiate Amateurism, Andrew B. Carrabis
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.
Miranda Warnings And Terry Stops: Another Perspective, Eugene L. Shapiro
Miranda Warnings And Terry Stops: Another Perspective, Eugene L. Shapiro
Barry Law Review
This article discusses the issue that federal Courts of Appeals have grappled with: whether an investigative stop upon less than probable cause under Terry v. Ohio may sometimes involve a need for Miranda warnings prior to questioning. It is the view of this commentary that post-Berkemer v. McCarty analyses by the Supreme Court concerning the Miranda “in custody” determination have had a singular influence upon judicial developments. There is now a very noticeable trend among the circuits towards the recognition of the appropriateness of Miranda warnings during some Terry stops.