Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Agency (1)
- Amicus brief (1)
- Antisubordination (1)
- Appellate opinions (1)
- Assimilation (1)
-
- Bisexuals (1)
- Camus (Albert) (1)
- Confession (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Culombe v. Connecticut (1)
- Culture (1)
- Decisionmaking (1)
- Defense of Marriage Act (1)
- Dickerson v. United States (1)
- Formal Equality (1)
- Gays (1)
- Heteronormativity (1)
- Homophobia (1)
- Homosexuals (1)
- Interrogation (1)
- Judge Richard A. Posner (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- LGBT (1)
- Legal academia (1)
- Lesbians (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Queer Theory (1)
- Romer v. Evans (1)
- Sexual Minorities (1)
- The Fall (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Miranda'S Fall?, Kenji Yoshino
Miranda'S Fall?, Kenji Yoshino
Michigan Law Review
If one wishes to revisit a classic, Albert Crunus's The Fall is a riskier choice than Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, which Steven Lubet eloquently discussed last year in these pages. It is not only that Camus's work will be less familiar to legal audiences than Lee's, despite the fact that The Fall is becoming recognized through critical "revisitation" as perhaps Crunus's greatest novel. It is also that the legal protagonist of The Fall, Jean-Baptiste Clamence, does not have Atticus Finch's immediate appeal. Finch is idealistic, Clamence is existential; Finch is pious, Clamence is debauched; Finch is hopeful, Clamence …
Foreword: The Question Of Process, J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii
Foreword: The Question Of Process, J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii
Michigan Law Review
Many in the legal profession have abandoned the great questions of legal process. This is too bad. How a decision is reached can be as important as what the decision is. In an increasingly diverse country with many competing visions of the good, it is critical for law to aspire to agreement on process - a task both more achievable than agreement on substance and more suited to our profession than waving the banners of ideological truth. By process, I mean the institutional routes by which we in America reach our most crucial decisions. In other words, process is our …
A Different Kind Of Sameness: Beyond Formal Equality And Antisubordination Principles In Gay Legal Theory And Constitutional Doctrine, Nancy Levit
Nancy Levit
Gay legal theory is at a crossroads reminiscent of the sameness/difference debate in feminist circles and the integrationist debate in critical race theory. Formal equality theorists take the heterosexual model as the norm and then seek to show that gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transsexuals - except for their choice of partners - are just like heterosexuals. Antisubordination theorists attack the heterosexual model itself and seek to show that a society that insists on such a model is unjust. Neither of these strategies is wholly satisfactory. The formal equality model will fail to bring about fundamental reforms as long as sexual …
Playing On Words: Judge Richard A. Posner's Appellate Opinions, 1981-82--Ruminations On Sexy Judicial Opinion Style During An Extraordinary Rookie Season, Robert F. Blomquist
Playing On Words: Judge Richard A. Posner's Appellate Opinions, 1981-82--Ruminations On Sexy Judicial Opinion Style During An Extraordinary Rookie Season, Robert F. Blomquist
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Comments On Clinton: Reconsidering The Role Of Natural Law In John Marshall's Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1141 (2000), James W. Ely
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.