Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Law and Economics (2)
- Cognitive theory (1)
- Coherence (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Corporation (1)
-
- Decision-making (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law & Language, Law & Literature (1)
- Legal Rhetoric (1)
- Legal rhetoric (1)
- Marketplace (1)
- Metaphor (1)
- Narration (1)
- Persuasion (1)
- Professional Life (1)
- Reader-response (1)
- Religion (1)
- Religious Lawyering (1)
- Religious Values, Legal Ethics and Legal Education (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
The Function Of The Supreme People’S Court Of Regulating Economy——Re-Evaluation Of The Zhongfu Industry Guarantee Case(最高法院规制经济的功能──再评“中福实业公司担保案”), Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
How The Supreme Court Regulates Economy: Review On Exterior Coordination Cost(最高人民法院如何规制经济──外部协调成本的考察), Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
Knowledge Constnlction And Academic Transformation On Sociology Of Law Studies In China(中国法律社会学的知识建构和学术转型), Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
Isn't That Unconstitutional? Religion And Professional Life, Amelia J. Uelmen
Isn't That Unconstitutional? Religion And Professional Life, Amelia J. Uelmen
Amelia J Uelmen
No abstract provided.
What Is The Sound Of A Corporation Speaking? How The Cognitive Theory Of Metaphor Can Help Lawyers Shape The Law, Linda L. Berger
What Is The Sound Of A Corporation Speaking? How The Cognitive Theory Of Metaphor Can Help Lawyers Shape The Law, Linda L. Berger
Linda L. Berger
No abstract provided.
Running Backs, Wolves, And Other Fatalities: How Manipulations Of Coherence In Legal Opinions Marginalize Violent Death, Jonathan Yovel
Running Backs, Wolves, And Other Fatalities: How Manipulations Of Coherence In Legal Opinions Marginalize Violent Death, Jonathan Yovel
Jonathan Yovel
By examining legal cases that involve violent death and its marginalization by the courts, this essay looks into the relations between narrative coherence and narrative absurd in judicial opinions. Coherence, rather than a static, unequivocal characteristic of legal narratives, is studied here as a highly manipulable narrative and rhetorical performance. Giving a performative twist to reader-response approaches I do not really ask what is the meaning of this text (as construed by its reading)? but rather, working from the position of the text's discursive community, what does this text do? The reading of these cases explores how judicial narration and …