Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Dobbs (1)
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (1)
-
- Donald Trump (1)
- Foreign Affairs Prosecutions (1)
- Indictments (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Polarization (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Prosecution (1)
- Public health (1)
- Reproductive coercion (1)
- Reproductive freedom (1)
- Reproductive justice (1)
- SCOTUS (1)
- Social Representations (1)
- Social repercussions (1)
- Symposium (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion, Aziza Ahmed, Dabney P. Evans, Jason Jackson, Benjamin Mason Meier, Cecília Tomori
Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion, Aziza Ahmed, Dabney P. Evans, Jason Jackson, Benjamin Mason Meier, Cecília Tomori
Faculty Scholarship
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health continues a trajectory of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that undermines the normative foundation of public health — the idea that the state is obligated to provide a robust set of supports for healthcare services and the underlying social determinants of health. Dobbs furthers a longstanding ideology of individual responsibility in public health, neglecting collective responsibility for better health outcomes. Such an ideology on individual responsibility not only enables a shrinking of public health infrastructure for reproductive health, it facilitates the rise of reproductive coercion and a criminal legal response to pregnancy and abortion. This commentary …
How Do Prosecutors "Send A Message"?, Steven Arrigg Koh
How Do Prosecutors "Send A Message"?, Steven Arrigg Koh
Faculty Scholarship
The recent indictments of former President Trump are stirring national debate about their effects on American society. Commentators speculate on the cases’ impact outside of the courtroom — on the 2024 election, on political polarization, and on the future of American democracy. Such cases originated in the prosecutor’s office, begging the question of if, when, and how prosecutors should consider the societal effects of the cases they bring.
Indeed, prosecutors often publicly claim that they “send a message” when they indict a defendant. What, exactly, does this mean? Often, their assumption is that such messaging goes in one direction: indictment …