Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 18 USC 7 (1)
- Adjudicative facts (1)
- Apprendi v. New Jersey (1)
- Behavioral Biology (1)
- Domestic Relations (1)
-
- Domestic Violence (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Fair trial (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Foster Care (1)
- Harmless error (1)
- Human Behavior (1)
- Judge (1)
- Judicial notice (1)
- Jurisdictional element (1)
- Jury (1)
- Juveniles (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legislative facts (1)
- Research (1)
- Ring v. Arizona (1)
- Rule 201 (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Social Welfare (1)
- Special territorial jurisdiction (1)
- Structural error (1)
- Violence (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Child Placement Decisions: The Relevance Of Facial Resemblance And Biological Relationships, David J. Herring
Child Placement Decisions: The Relevance Of Facial Resemblance And Biological Relationships, David J. Herring
Articles
This article discusses two studies of evolution and human behavior addressing child-adult relationships and explores implications for policies and practices surrounding placement of children in foster homes. The first study indicates that men favor children whose facial features resemble their own facial features. This study may justify public child welfare decisionmakers in considering facial resemblance as they attempt to place children in safe foster homes.
The second study indicates that parents are likely to invest more in children who are biologically related to them, thus enhancing their long term well-being. Among other implications, this study may justify public child welfare …
Trust Me, I’M A Judge: Why Binding Judicial Notice Of Jurisdictional Facts Violates The Right To Jury Trial, William M. Carter Jr.
Trust Me, I’M A Judge: Why Binding Judicial Notice Of Jurisdictional Facts Violates The Right To Jury Trial, William M. Carter Jr.
Articles
The conventional model of criminal trials holds that the prosecution is required to prove every element of the offense beyond the jury's reasonable doubt. The American criminal justice system is premised on the right of the accused to have all facts relevant to his guilt or innocence decided by a jury of his peers. The role of the judge is seen as limited to deciding issues of law and facilitating the jury's fact-finding. Despite these principles,judges are reluctant to submit to the jury elements of the offense that the judge perceives to be . routine, uncontroversial or uncontested.
One such …