Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 1983 (1)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Civil rights (1)
-
- Civil society (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Collaborative Community-based Natural Resource Management (1)
- Conservation (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Copenhagen (1)
- Environmental Movements (1)
- Environmental justice (1)
- Good governance (1)
- Historical development of rights language (1)
- Interest Theory (1)
- NGOs (1)
- Natural Rights (1)
- Non-State Actor (1)
- Ockham (1)
- Particularity (1)
- Pearson v. Callahan (1)
- Plausibility (1)
- Pleading (1)
- Poverty (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Public Participation (1)
- Qualified immunity (1)
- Rights (1)
- Seattle (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
From Objective Right To Subjective Rights: The Franciscans And The Interest And Will Conceptions Of Rights, Siegfried Van Duffel
From Objective Right To Subjective Rights: The Franciscans And The Interest And Will Conceptions Of Rights, Siegfried Van Duffel
Siegfried Van Duffel
What are subjective rights? And what makes Will and Interest conceptions of rights into conceptions of rights? I argue that they originate in two very different natural rights theories which are, however, grounded in the same philosophical anthropology.
Pearson, Iqbal, And Procedural Judicial Activism, Goutam U. Jois
Pearson, Iqbal, And Procedural Judicial Activism, Goutam U. Jois
Goutam U Jois
In its most recent term, the Supreme Court decided Pearson v. Callahan and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, two cases that, even at this early date, can safely be called “game-changers.” What is fairly well known is that Iqbal and Pearson, on their own terms, will hurt civil rights plaintiffs. A point that has not been explored is how the interaction between Iqbal and Pearson will also hurt civil rights plaintiffs. First, the cases threaten to catch plaintiffs on the horns of a dilemma: Iqbal says, in effect, that greater detail is required to get allegations past the motion to dismiss stage. …
Collaborative Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Prof. Elizabeth Burleson
Collaborative Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Prof. Elizabeth Burleson
Prof. Elizabeth Burleson
This article analyzes the importance of increasing civil society actor access to and influence in international legal and policy negotiations, drawing from academic scholarship on governance, conservation and environmental sustainability, natural resource management, observations of civil society actors, and the authors’ experiences as participants in international environmental negotiations.