Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (2)
- Graham (2)
- Law enforcement (2)
- Roadblock (2)
- Supreme Court 1988-89 Term (2)
-
- Touro Law School (2)
- "special needs" doctrine (1)
- 1983 litigation (1)
- Aerial surveillance (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Arizona V. Youngblood: Does the Criminal Defendant Lose His Right to Due Process When the State Loses Exculpatory Evidence (1)
- Arrest (1)
- Attorney’s fee (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Balancing approach (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Brower (1)
- Brutality claims (1)
- Brutality litigation (1)
- Commerce clause (1)
- Compensatory damages (1)
- Congress (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Constitutional convention (1)
- DeShaney (1)
- Defendant (1)
- Destruction (1)
- Due process (1)
- Due process standard (1)
- Eleventh amendment jurisprudence (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
In The Beginning: The Washington Supreme Court A Century Ago, Charles H. Sheldon, Michael Stohr-Gillmore
In The Beginning: The Washington Supreme Court A Century Ago, Charles H. Sheldon, Michael Stohr-Gillmore
Seattle University Law Review
This Article will discuss (1) the politics that influenced the drafting of the judicial article (article IV) in the constitutional convention; (2) the election of the first five members of the bench and the backgrounds of those inaugural judges; (3) the particular approach toward judicial review adopted by these five jurists (activism-restraint); and (4) the personal relations among these members of the supreme court. This Article will provide a personal perspective of the first five judges and their court.
Fourth Amendment, William E. Hellerstein