Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- China (1)
- China judiciary (1)
- Chinese judicial system (1)
- European Union; Republicanism; Republican; Public Goods; Freedoms; Human Diginity; Public law; State; Liberalism; Eyal Benvensti; International law; Globalization; 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights; European Convention on Human Rights; European Court of Human Rights; International Court of Justice; Chart of the United Nations; Utilitarian; Immanuel Kant; Inalienable; John Locke; Natural law; Right of nations; Arthur Ripstein (1)
- Executive order (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
China's Judiciary: Current Issues, Jianli Song
China's Judiciary: Current Issues, Jianli Song
Maine Law Review
Since 1978, China has been engaged in a major reform program of economic modernization and growing openness to the outside world. The movement towards a market economy has resulted in impressive economic growth. It has also led to social change, including increasing pressure from segments of the population for greater participation in decision making and respect for human rights. The Chinese government is taking steps towards the rule of law. The legal reforms being carried out go beyond the economic sphere, and also gradually will affect the relationship between individuals and the state. Dialogue with the international community has broadened …
Unilateral Jurisdiction To Provide Global Public Goods: A Republican Account, Aravind Ganesh
Unilateral Jurisdiction To Provide Global Public Goods: A Republican Account, Aravind Ganesh
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Failures of international cooperation with regard to protecting the environment, regulating cross-border competition, and preventing terrorism have sometimes lead states to enact unilateral measures with extraterritorial effect. A common trend among international legal scholars defending these measures is to employ the concept of ‘global public goods,’ understood as desirable, utility-advancing things that tend, for various reasons, to be undersupplied by states acting separately. On this view, unilateral measures are justified on grounds that they address ‘harms’ to ‘interests’ that cannot be contained within individual states, or because they advance supposedly universal ‘values.’ Drawing from the ‘republican’ legal and political philosophy …
Willful Blindness Or Deliberate Indifference: The United States' Abdication Of Legal Responsibility To Refugees, Abed A. Ayoub, Yolanda C. Rondon
Willful Blindness Or Deliberate Indifference: The United States' Abdication Of Legal Responsibility To Refugees, Abed A. Ayoub, Yolanda C. Rondon
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.