Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 2006 (1)
- 4th amendment (1)
- 6th amendment (1)
- AEDPA (1)
- Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (1)
-
- Apprendi v. New Jersey (1)
- Arbitrary stop (1)
- Brendlin (1)
- Brendlin v. California (1)
- Capital case (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Car search (1)
- Case assignments (1)
- Court of the Southern District of New York (1)
- Court rules (1)
- Crawford (1)
- Criminal decisions (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal law and procedure (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Danforth (1)
- Danforth v. Minnesota (1)
- Daniels v. City of New York (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Effective assistance of counsel (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Fraud and identity theft (1)
- Harmless error (1)
- Illegal search (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Criminal Procedure Decisions From The October 2006 Term, Susan N. Herman
Criminal Procedure Decisions From The October 2006 Term, Susan N. Herman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Danger Of Nonrandom Case Assignment: How The Southern District Of New York's "Related Cases" Rule Shaped Stop-And-Frisk Rulings, Katherine A. Macfarlane
The Danger Of Nonrandom Case Assignment: How The Southern District Of New York's "Related Cases" Rule Shaped Stop-And-Frisk Rulings, Katherine A. Macfarlane
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
The Southern District of New York’s local rules are clear: “[A]ll active judges . . . shall be assigned substantially an equal share of the categories of cases of the court over a period of time.” Yet for the past fourteen years, Southern District Judge Shira Scheindlin has been granted near-exclusive jurisdiction over one category of case: those involving wide-sweeping constitutional challenges to the New York Police Department’s (NYPD) stop-and-frisk policies. In 1999, Judge Scheindlin was randomly assigned Daniels v. City of New York, the first in a series of high-profile and high-impact stop-and-frisk cases. Since then, she has overseen …
Comments: Droning On About The Fourth Amendment: Adopting A Reasonable Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence To Prevent Unreasonable Searches By Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Joel Celso
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.