Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Equal protection (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
-
- Business (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Constitutional Law, Generally (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Dignity (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Due process (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- General Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Marketing (1)
- Politics (1)
- Segmentation (1)
- Social Psychology and Law (1)
- Social capital (1)
- Social psychology (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Discrimination In Customer Segmentation Marketing Practices, Jude A. Thomas
Discrimination In Customer Segmentation Marketing Practices, Jude A. Thomas
Jude A Thomas
Customer segmentation is a powerful analytical marketing practice that is employed by a wide range of businesses to segregate customers with similar characteristics into subgroups in order to inform operational business processes. Such practices allow firms to better allocate their resources in order to form more profitable customer relationships, but they also have the capacity to lead to unfair discriminatory impact upon customer groups. Current legislation is largely unprotective of customers so positioned, but recent trends in the insurance and lending industries suggest that a broader application of anti-discrimination laws could foretell a future of greater restrictions on the implementation …
Preventing Balkanization Or Facilitating Racial Domination: A Critique Of The New Equal Protection, Darren L. Hutchinson
Preventing Balkanization Or Facilitating Racial Domination: A Critique Of The New Equal Protection, Darren L. Hutchinson
Darren L Hutchinson
Abstract
Preventing Balkanization or Facilitating Racial Domination: A Critique of the
New Equal Protection
The Supreme Court requires that equal protection plaintiffs prove defendants acted with discriminatory intent. The intent rule has insulated from judicial invalidation numerous policies that harmfully impact racial and ethnic minorities. Court doctrine also mandates that state actors remain colorblind. The colorblindness doctrine has caused the Court to invalidate many policies that were designed to ameliorate the conditions of racial inequality. Taken together, these two equality doctrines facilitate racial domination. The Court justifies this outcome on the ground that the Constitution does not protect “group rights.” …
¿Con La Misma Vara? Los Altibajos De La Igual Protección De Las Leyes En Las Opiniones Del Juez Federico Hernández Denton, Jorge R. Roig
¿Con La Misma Vara? Los Altibajos De La Igual Protección De Las Leyes En Las Opiniones Del Juez Federico Hernández Denton, Jorge R. Roig
Jorge R Roig