Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Comparative Law; Judges; Transnational Law (2)
- 14th Amendment (1)
- Central American Integration (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Constitutional (1)
-
- Constitutional interpretation (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Due process (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Fundamental rights (1)
- Incorporation (1)
- Judicial Restraint (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justice John Paul Stevens (1)
- Personal Jurisdiction (1)
- Police power (1)
- Privileges and immunities (1)
- Privileges or immunities clause (1)
- Regional Integration; Central American Identity; Constitutional Borrowing (1)
- Slaughter-House (1)
- Slaughterhouse Cases (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Transnational Constitutional Law; European Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
The Central American Constitutional Identity. A Study Of The Constitutional Imitation Phenomenon In The Integration Process Of The Region, Prof. Michele Carducci
The Central American Constitutional Identity. A Study Of The Constitutional Imitation Phenomenon In The Integration Process Of The Region, Prof. Michele Carducci
Michele Carducci Prof.
No abstract provided.
Is “Transnational” Constitutional Law Possible?, Prof. Michele Carducci
Is “Transnational” Constitutional Law Possible?, Prof. Michele Carducci
Michele Carducci Prof.
No abstract provided.
The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence Of Justice John Paul Stevens, Rodger D. Citron
The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence Of Justice John Paul Stevens, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
What If Slaughter-House Had Been Decided Differently?, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
What If Slaughter-House Had Been Decided Differently?, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
All Faculty Scholarship
In The Slaugherhouse Cases, the Supreme Court gutted the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Though academics continue to argue that Slaughterhouse was wrongly decided and should be overruled, the practical consequences of doing so might not be enormous. The constitutional rights the dissenters found in the Privileges or Immunities Clause are part of our current law anyway, through the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses. But this does not mean that Slaughterhouse cost us nothing. This article explores how our law might be different had Slaughterhouse been decided differently. Rather than taking up the role that Privileges …