Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ART (1)
- Abortion Jurisprudence (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Arizona Supreme Court (1)
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology (1)
- Babies (1)
- Birth Standard (1)
- Brain science (1)
- Children (1)
- Clinical psychology (1)
- Cryopreservation (1)
- Divorce (1)
- Embryonic Personhood (1)
- Fertility (1)
- IVF (1)
- In Vitro Fertilization (1)
- Pre-Embryo Disposition (1)
- Pre-Embryos (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Scalia (1)
- Section 318.08 (1)
- Social psychology (1)
- Title 25 (1)
- Torres v. Terrell (1)
- Wild West (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
The Child Vanishes: Justice Scalia's Approach To The Role Of Psychology In Determining Children's Rights And Responsibilities, Aviva Orenstein
The Child Vanishes: Justice Scalia's Approach To The Role Of Psychology In Determining Children's Rights And Responsibilities, Aviva Orenstein
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This Article explores how Justice Antonin Scalia’s hostility to psychology, antipathy to granting children autonomous rights, and dismissiveness of children’s interior lives both affected his jurisprudence and was a natural outgrowth of it. Justice Scalia expressed a skeptical, one might even say hostile, attitude towards psychology and its practitioners. Justice Scalia’s cynicism about the discipline and the therapists who practice it is particularly interesting regarding legal and policy arguments concerning children. His love of tradition and his rigid and unempathetic approach to children clash with modern notions of child psychology. Justice Scalia’s attitude towards psychology helps to explain his jurisprudence, …
Arizona's Torres V. Terrell And Section 318.03: The Wild West Of Pre-Embryo Disposition, Catherine Wheatley
Arizona's Torres V. Terrell And Section 318.03: The Wild West Of Pre-Embryo Disposition, Catherine Wheatley
Indiana Law Journal
In this Note, Part I examines the three main approaches used in other state supreme court decisions to decide pre-embryo disposition disputes, as well as three perspectives on the legal status of the pre-embryo, and compares them with Arizona’s emerging law. Part II summarizes Arizona’s Torres trial court order and opinion and section 318.03. Part III then analyzes whether the Torres orders and Arizona’s new statutory “most likely to lead to birth standard”12 present constitutional issues and concludes that the trial court’s order, if reinstated by the Arizona Supreme Court, and section 318.03 can be challenged on substantive due process …