Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (3)
- Criminal law (3)
- Sentencing (2)
- Automatic standing rule (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
-
- Chief Justice Burger (1)
- Child abuse (1)
- Child victims (1)
- Child witnesses (1)
- Children as witnesses (1)
- Confrontation clause (1)
- Congress (1)
- Coy v. Iowa (1)
- Criminal defendants (1)
- Criminal sentences (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Double jeopardy (1)
- Due process (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Impeachment (1)
- Interrogations (1)
- Judicial conservatism (1)
- Judicial error (1)
- Juvenile executions (1)
- Juvenile offenders (1)
- Legislative delegation (1)
- Mistretta v. U.S. (1)
- Parole (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
United States V. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence Of Automatic Standing, William C. Bollard
United States V. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence Of Automatic Standing, William C. Bollard
Pepperdine Law Review
The United States Supreme Court recently abolished the automatic standing rule in United States v. Salvucci. The author analyzes the difficulties created for the criminal defendant charged with a possessory crime. In particular, this note focuses on the inequitable position the defendant is placed in when his suppression hearing testimony is used as a tool to impeach subsequent testimony offered at trial. The author continues by pointing out that the "prosecutorial self-contradiction," sought to be abolished in Salvucci, remains a part of our present judicial system. In conclusion, the author offers several considerations that will necessarily be an integral part …
United States V. Henry: The Further Expansion Of The Criminal Defendant's Right To Counsel During Interrogations, Kevin T. Kerr
United States V. Henry: The Further Expansion Of The Criminal Defendant's Right To Counsel During Interrogations, Kevin T. Kerr
Pepperdine Law Review
Despite the Burger Court's history of judicial conservatism, the Supreme Court in United States v. Henry exceeds the liberality of the Warren Court in the area of criminal defendant rights. The decision in Henry clearly provides further limitations upon the government's ability to conduct interrogations. The author examines the Court's factual and legal analysis of the case, emphasizes how the test established in Henry surpasses the rule promulgated in Massiah, and discusses the decision's impact as well as the curious turnabout of Chief Justice Burger.
Coy V. Iowa: A Constitutional Right Of Intimidation, John A. Mayers
Coy V. Iowa: A Constitutional Right Of Intimidation, John A. Mayers
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thompson V. Oklahoma: Debating The Constitutionality Of Juvenile Executions, Susan M. Simmons
Thompson V. Oklahoma: Debating The Constitutionality Of Juvenile Executions, Susan M. Simmons
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Sentencing Error: Thomas V. Morris And The Double Jeopardy Clause , Paul G. Flynn
Judicial Sentencing Error: Thomas V. Morris And The Double Jeopardy Clause , Paul G. Flynn
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of The Federal Sentencing Reform Act After Mistretta V. United States, Charles R. Eskridge Iii
The Constitutionality Of The Federal Sentencing Reform Act After Mistretta V. United States, Charles R. Eskridge Iii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.