Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Claims (1)
- Competition (1)
- Creditors (1)
- Damages (1)
-
- Declaratory judgment (1)
- Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice (1)
- Equivalents (1)
- Federal Circuit (1)
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co. (1)
- Infringement (1)
- Injury (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Patent law (1)
- Political Pressure (1)
- Price discrimination (1)
- Pricing (1)
- Property rights (1)
- Public notice (1)
- Quia timet (1)
- Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act (1)
- Roscoe Pound (1)
- Specific exclusion (1)
- State Courts (1)
- Sureties (1)
- Unpopular Judicial Decisions (1)
- Virginia Declaratory Judgment Act (1)
- Volvo Trucks North America Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC Inc. (1)
- White Act (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
The History And Scope Of The Virginia Declaratory Judgments Act, Seth M. Land
The History And Scope Of The Virginia Declaratory Judgments Act, Seth M. Land
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Exclusion Confusion? A Defense Of The Federal Circuit's Specific Exclusion Jurisprudence, Peter Curtis Magic
Exclusion Confusion? A Defense Of The Federal Circuit's Specific Exclusion Jurisprudence, Peter Curtis Magic
Michigan Law Review
Specific exclusion has become a controversial limitation on the doctrine of equivalents, which is itself an essential and controversial area of patent law. The doctrine of equivalents allows a patentee to successfully claim infringement against devices that are outside of the literal reach of the language used by the patentee in her patent to describe what she claims as her invention. The Supreme Court has prescribed some of the outer limits of the doctrine of equivalents and articulated the underlying policy concerns that inform its analysis-noting that courts should balance protection of the patentee's intellectual property with the public's reasonable …
Reading Too Much Into Reeder-Simco?, Jeremy M. Suhr
Reading Too Much Into Reeder-Simco?, Jeremy M. Suhr
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that a careful analysis of the Supreme Court's opinion in Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc. demonstrates that, despite the expansive dicta appearing in part IV of that opinion, the Court did not intend to reshape the course of its Robinson-Patman Act jurisprudence in any significant way. The Court's opinion operated well within the confines of established Robinson-Patman Act doctrine, even if its searching review of the evidence presented at trial represented a rare foray into the arena of factual error correction. After Reeder-Simco, however, many commentators emphasized the dicta in part IV …
Building Support For Strong, Fair, And Impartial Courts, Michael A. Wolff
Building Support For Strong, Fair, And Impartial Courts, Michael A. Wolff
Indiana Law Journal
Conference of Chief Justices and Conference of State Court Administrators Annual Meeting July 29-August 2, 2006 Indianapolis, Indiana.
What Process Is Due In The Adjudication Of Erisa Claims?, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 811 (2007), Mark D. Debofsky
What Process Is Due In The Adjudication Of Erisa Claims?, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 811 (2007), Mark D. Debofsky
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Who Is Entitled To Survivor Benefits From Erisa Plans?, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 919 (2007), Albert Feuer
Who Is Entitled To Survivor Benefits From Erisa Plans?, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 919 (2007), Albert Feuer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expert Testimony Disclosure Under Federal Rule 26: A Proposed Amendment, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 117 (2007), Keith H. Beyler
Expert Testimony Disclosure Under Federal Rule 26: A Proposed Amendment, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 117 (2007), Keith H. Beyler
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.