Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Alsification (1)
- Attorney general (1)
- Ballot initiative (1)
- Constitutional nondefense (1)
- Direct democracy (1)
-
- Doctrinal determinacy (1)
- Doctrinal indeterminacy (1)
- Doctrinal reasoning (1)
- Doctrine (1)
- Duty to defend (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Empirical methods (1)
- Empiricism (1)
- Evolving Standards of Decency (1)
- Executive (1)
- Expressivism (1)
- Formalism (1)
- Judicial decision making (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal determinacy (1)
- Legal realism (1)
- Legal reasoning (1)
- Legal theory (1)
- Marriage equality (1)
- Media (1)
- New Legal Realism (1)
- Nondefense (1)
- Political science (1)
- Politics (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Declining Controversial Cases: How Marriage Equality Changed The Paradigm, Elena Baylis
Declining Controversial Cases: How Marriage Equality Changed The Paradigm, Elena Baylis
Articles
Until recently, state attorneys general defended their states’ laws as a matter of course. However, one attorney general’s decision not to defend his state’s law in a prominent marriage equality case sparked a cascade of attorney general declinations in other marriage equality cases. Declinations have also increased across a range of states and with respect to several other contentious subjects, including abortion and gun control. This Essay evaluates the causes and implications of this recent trend of state attorneys general abstaining from defending controversial laws on the grounds that those laws are unconstitutional, focusing on the marriage equality cases as …
Evolving Standards Of Domination: Abandoning A Flawed Legal Standard And Approaching A New Era In Penal Reform, Spearit
Articles
This Article critiques the evolving standards of decency doctrine as a form of Social Darwinism. It argues that evolving standards of decency provided a system of review that was tailor-made for Civil Rights opponents to scale back racial progress. Although as a doctrinal matter, evolving standards sought to tie punishment practices to social mores, prison sentencing became subject to political agendas that determined the course of punishment more than the benevolence of a maturing society. Indeed, rather than the fierce competition that is supposed to guide social development, the criminal justice system was consciously deployed as a means of social …
Empirical Doctrine, Jessie Allen
Empirical Doctrine, Jessie Allen
Articles
We can observe and measure how legal decision makers use formal legal authorities, but there is no way to empirically test the determinative capacity of legal doctrine itself. Yet, discussions of empirical studies of judicial behavior sometimes conflate judges’ attention to legal rules with legal rules determining outcomes. Doctrinal determinacy is not the same thing as legal predictability. The extent to which legal outcomes are predictable in given contexts is surely testable empirically. But the idea that doctrine’s capacity to produce or limit those outcomes can be measured empirically is fundamentally misguided. The problem is that to measure doctrinal determinacy, …