Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (12)
- Brooklyn Law School (11)
- Selected Works (7)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- University of South Florida (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judge (9)
- Civil procedure (8)
- Chief Judge (6)
- Constitutional Convention (6)
- Dual Constitutionalism (6)
-
- Judith S. Kaye (6)
- Justice Brennan (6)
- New York (6)
- New York City Bar Association (6)
- New York Court of Appeals (6)
- Opportunity (6)
- Skadden (6)
- Women lawyers (6)
- United States Supreme Court (5)
- ICJ (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Section 1983 (4)
- Supreme court (4)
- Authority (3)
- Civil rights (3)
- Congress (3)
- Court (3)
- Criminal law (3)
- Criminal procedure (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Extraterritorial jurisdiction (3)
- Federal courts (3)
- Federalism (3)
- Human rights (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Publication
-
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (12)
- Brooklyn Law Review (7)
- Touro Law Review (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Journal of Law and Policy (3)
-
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (2)
- Randy J Kozel (2)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (2)
- Articles (1)
- Benjamin L. Berger (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (1)
- Donald J. Kochan (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Laura Moyer (1)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (1)
- Nebraska College of Law: Faculty Publications (1)
- Northwestern University Law Review (1)
- Pace Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Scott Dodson (1)
- Thomas E. Baker (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 63
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
When You Come To A Fork In The Road, Take It: Unifying The Split In New York's Analysis Of In-House Attorney-Client Privilege, Thomas O'Connor
When You Come To A Fork In The Road, Take It: Unifying The Split In New York's Analysis Of In-House Attorney-Client Privilege, Thomas O'Connor
Journal of Law and Policy
As one surveys the vast and ever-changing landscape of law and litigation, few things stand out as so unanimously exalted and carefully guarded as the privilege protecting attorney-client communications. Yet there is today a surprising lack of uniformity and predictability in the reasoning by which New York courts determine whether a communication made by in-house counsel to its corporate client will – or will not – enjoy the protection of that privilege. Rather than follow a single and predictable analysis to resolve the question, New York courts have oscillated between one line of decisions focusing primarily on the purpose of …
Wrestling With Punishment: The Role Of The Bc Court Of Appeal In The Law Of Sentencing, Benjamin Berger, Gerry Ferguson
Wrestling With Punishment: The Role Of The Bc Court Of Appeal In The Law Of Sentencing, Benjamin Berger, Gerry Ferguson
Benjamin L. Berger
This article, one in a collection of articles on the history and jurisprudential contributions of the British Columbia Court of Appeal on the occasion of its 100th anniversary, looks at the role and the work of the court in the area of sentencing since the court was first given jurisdiction to hear sentence appeals in 1921. In the three broad periods that we canvass, we draw out the sometimes surprising, often unique, and frequently provocative ways in which the BCCA has, over its history, wrestled with the practice of criminal punishment and, with it, the basic assumptions of our system …
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
If appellate advocates could hear from courts about topics that might be raised during oral argument—as opposed to relying solely on their ability to anticipate the issues—might their answers be better? That seems likely, but it is unlikely that research could confirm that, as judicial practice overwhelmingly favors impromptu questioning. Spontaneity may be harmless if the question was predictable, or unavoidable if a judge just thought of the question. But sometimes advocates have to answer challenging questions concerning the law, facts, or implications of a position—questions that help decide the case, either due to the quality of the answer or …
Superfund Chaos Theory: What Happens When The Lower Federal Courts Don't Follow The Supreme Court, Steven Ferrey
Superfund Chaos Theory: What Happens When The Lower Federal Courts Don't Follow The Supreme Court, Steven Ferrey
Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law
There is legal chaos in the national Superfund. The Supreme Court reversed decisions of eleven federal circuit courts in United States v. Atlantic Research Corp. There is no instance in modern Supreme Court history where the Court reversed every federal circuit court in the country, as it did in Atlantic Research. The Supreme Court’s reversal was through a unanimous decision. This was extraordinary: It not only reversed the entire legal interpretation of one of America’s most critical statutes, but also re-allocated billions of dollars among private parties.
The Supreme Court, when it rendered its decision, seemed to be rectifying a …
An Empirical Study Of Implicit Takings., James E. Krier, Stewart E. Sterk
An Empirical Study Of Implicit Takings., James E. Krier, Stewart E. Sterk
Articles
Takings scholarship has long focused on the niceties of Supreme Court doctrine, while ignoring the operation of takings law "on the ground" in the state and lower federal courts, which together decide the vast bulk of all takings cases. This study, based primarily on an empirical analysis of more than 2000 reported decisions ovcr the period 1979 through 2012, attempts to fill that void. This study establishes that the Supreme Court's categorical rules govern almost no state takings cases, and that takings claims based on government regulation almost invariably fail. By contrast, when takings claims arise out of government action …
New Judicial Review In Old Europe, Alyssa S. King
New Judicial Review In Old Europe, Alyssa S. King
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Advocacy Through Briefs In The U.S. Court Of Appeals., Susan B. Haire, Laura P. Moyer
Advocacy Through Briefs In The U.S. Court Of Appeals., Susan B. Haire, Laura P. Moyer
Laura Moyer
The focus of this paper is to evaluate the role of advocates in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit by examining the characterization of issues offered in appellate briefs against the issues addressed in the court's decisions. Specifically, in an environment in which attorneys are expected to frame the issues on appeal and judges are expected to respond to those issues, what accounts for judges addressing some issues while suppressing others? By explicitly focusing on how the substantive content of an opinion is shaped, we depart from other, earlier scholarship on the advantages of "repeat player" litigants …
The Scope Of Precedent, Randy J. Kozel
The Scope Of Precedent, Randy J. Kozel
Randy J Kozel
The scope of Supreme Court precedent is capacious. Justices of the Court commonly defer to sweeping rationales and elaborate doctrinal frameworks articulated by their predecessors. This practice infuses judicial precedent with the prescriptive power of enacted constitutional and statutory text. The lower federal courts follow suit, regularly abiding by the Supreme Court's broad pronouncements. These phenomena cannot be explained by—and, indeed, oftentimes subvert—the classic distinction between binding holdings and dispensable dicta.
This Article connects the scope of precedent with recurring and foundational debates about the proper ends of judicial interpretation. A precedent's forward-looking effect should not depend on the superficial …
Stare Decisis As Judicial Doctrine, Randy J. Kozel
Stare Decisis As Judicial Doctrine, Randy J. Kozel
Randy J Kozel
Stare decisis has been called many things, among them a principle of policy, a series of prudential and pragmatic considerations, and simply the preferred course. Often overlooked is the fact that stare decisis is also a judicial doctrine, an analytical system used to guide the rules of decision for resolving concrete disputes that come before the courts.
This Article examines stare decisis as applied by the U.S. Supreme Court, our nation’s highest doctrinal authority. A review of the Court’s jurisprudence yields two principal lessons about the modern doctrine of stare decisis. First, the doctrine is comprised largely of malleable factors …
Equity In International Law: Its Growth And Development, S. K. Chattopadhyay
Equity In International Law: Its Growth And Development, S. K. Chattopadhyay
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Transgressions Of A Timid Judiciary: Our Highest Court's Refusal To Overturn Abood V. Board Of Education—Harris V. Quinn, Joe E. Ling
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Scrivener’S Error, Ryan D. Doerfler
The Scrivener’S Error, Ryan D. Doerfler
Northwestern University Law Review
It is widely accepted that courts may correct legislative drafting mistakes, i.e., so-called scrivener’s errors, if and only if such mistakes are “absolutely clear.” The rationale is that if a court were to recognize a less clear error, it might be “rewriting” the statute rather than correcting a technical mistake.
This Article argues that the standard is much too strict. The current rationale ignores that courts can “rewrite,” i.e., misinterpret, a statute both by recognizing an error and by failing to do so. Accordingly, because the current doctrine is designed to protect against one type of mistake (false positives) but …
Imagined Identities: Defining The Racial Group In The Crime Of Genocide, Carola Lingaas
Imagined Identities: Defining The Racial Group In The Crime Of Genocide, Carola Lingaas
Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal
The provisions on genocide protect four exclusive, amongst others the racial, groups. Yet, international criminal tribunals are manifestly uncomfortable with collective groupings and interpret ‘race’ rather inconsistently. Nevertheless, there is a tendency to a subjective approach based upon the perpetrator’s perception of the targeted group. The victim’s membership is accordingly not determined objectively, but by the perception of differentness. This article incorporates the theory of imagined identities into law, thereby providing tribunals with a tool to define ‘race’. Its essence is that even if the group does not exist, it must be granted protection because of its perceived and thereby …
The Judicial Dilemma O’Callahan V. Parker Presents To Sofa’S, Ernest V. Harris
The Judicial Dilemma O’Callahan V. Parker Presents To Sofa’S, Ernest V. Harris
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Judicial Recusation In The Federal Republic Of Germany, Sigmund A. Cohn
Judicial Recusation In The Federal Republic Of Germany, Sigmund A. Cohn
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Some Structural Dilemmas Of World Organization, C. Wilfred Jenks
Some Structural Dilemmas Of World Organization, C. Wilfred Jenks
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Teaching Of International Law, Myres S. Mcdougal
The Teaching Of International Law, Myres S. Mcdougal
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Teaching Of International Law, Edward Mcwhinney
The Teaching Of International Law, Edward Mcwhinney
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Teaching Of International Law, Ian Brownlie
The Teaching Of International Law, Ian Brownlie
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Proper Reach Of Territorial Jurisdiction: A Case Study Of Divergent Attitudes, Robert Y. Jennings
The Proper Reach Of Territorial Jurisdiction: A Case Study Of Divergent Attitudes, Robert Y. Jennings
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Place Of Policy In International Law, D. H. N. Johnson
The Place Of Policy In International Law, D. H. N. Johnson
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Place Of Policy In International Law, Oscar Schachter
The Place Of Policy In International Law, Oscar Schachter
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Introductory Statement, Rosalyn Higgins
Introductory Statement, Rosalyn Higgins
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Circuit Splits And Empiricism In The Supreme Court, Karen M. Gebbia
Circuit Splits And Empiricism In The Supreme Court, Karen M. Gebbia
Pace Law Review
This Article demonstrates, empirically rather than merely in theory, how a failure to do so leads to unreliable conclusions concerning the relationship between the Supreme Court and the circuit courts of appeal. Specifically, commentators routinely misapply facially accurate raw data regarding the rate at which the Court reverses circuit court decisions to support unreliable conclusions regarding the comparative degree of accord between the Court and individual circuits. Commentators and the popular press then employ these unreliable conclusions to draw unsupported inferences regarding the reasons for supposed discord between the Court and the circuits, and to urge fundamental institutional reforms ranging …
The Voting Rights Act And The "New And Improved" Intent Test: Old Wine In New Bottles, Randolph M. Scott-Mclaughlin
The Voting Rights Act And The "New And Improved" Intent Test: Old Wine In New Bottles, Randolph M. Scott-Mclaughlin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Part Ii, John Williams
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Part Ii, John Williams
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Fred Brewington
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Fred Brewington
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Prosecution And Section 1983, Barry C. Scheck
Criminal Prosecution And Section 1983, Barry C. Scheck
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Qualified Immunity When Facts Are In Dispute, Leon Friedman
Qualified Immunity When Facts Are In Dispute, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
Sua Sponte Actions In The Appellate Courts: The "Gorilla Rule" Revisited, Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Aaron S. Lichter
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.