Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- American Foreign Trade (1)
- American Philosophy of Government (1)
- Cardozo (Benjamin N.) (1)
- Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (1)
- Due process (1)
-
- Equal protection (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Harvey (Richard S.) (1)
- Judicial non-interference (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Judicial self-denial (1)
- Laissez faire (1)
- Muller v. Oregon (1)
- Notz (William F.) (1)
- Occasional Papers and Addresses of an American Lawyer (1)
- Police power (1)
- Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences (1)
- Snow (Alpheus Henry) (1)
- Social legislation (1)
- Taft (Henry W.) (1)
- The Nature of the Judicial Process (1)
- True Relation (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Social And Economic Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robert Eugene Cushman
Social And Economic Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robert Eugene Cushman
Michigan Law Review
For those who love precision and definiteness the question of the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to social and economic problems remains an irritating enigma. The judicial construction of due process of law and the equal protection of the law has from the first discouraged systematic analysis and defied synthesis. More than one writer has emerged from the study of the problem with a neat and compact set of fundamental principles, only to have the Supreme Court discourteously ignore them in its next case. But paradoxical as it may seem, those who long for a wise and forward-looking solution of …
Book Reviews, Nathan Isaacs, Horace Lafayette Wilgus, Arthur H. Basye, Leonard D. White, Victor H. Lane, Edwin D. Dickinson
Book Reviews, Nathan Isaacs, Horace Lafayette Wilgus, Arthur H. Basye, Leonard D. White, Victor H. Lane, Edwin D. Dickinson
Michigan Law Review
What does a judge do when he decides a case? It would be interesting to collect the answers ranging from those furnished by primitive systems of law in which the judge was supposed to consult the gods to the ultra-modern, rather profane system described to me recently by a retrospective judge: "I make up my mind which way the case ought to be decided, and then I see if I can't get some legal ground to make it stick." Perhaps the widespread impression is the curiously erroneous one lampooned by Gnaeus Flavius (Kantorowitz). The judge is supposed to sit at …