Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Aliens abroad (1)
- Applicable law (1)
- Boumediene v. Bush (1)
- Choice of forum (1)
- Choice of law (1)
-
- Conflict of laws (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Consumer contracts (1)
- Consumer protection (1)
- Detainees (1)
- Dispute resolution (1)
- Due process (1)
- European private law (1)
- Executive detention (1)
- Extraterritorial jurisprudence (1)
- Fundamental norms jurisprudence (1)
- Habeas rights (1)
- International commercial law (1)
- International consumer law (1)
- International law (1)
- Nonderogable norms (1)
- Party autonomy (1)
- Private international law (1)
- Rome I (1)
- Suspension Clause (1)
- Torture (1)
- U.S. Constitution (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
The Rome I Regulation Rules On Party Autonomy For Choice Of Law: A U.S. Perspective, Ronald A. Brand
The Rome I Regulation Rules On Party Autonomy For Choice Of Law: A U.S. Perspective, Ronald A. Brand
Articles
This chapter was presented at a conference in Dublin on the (then) new Rome I Regulation of the European Union in the fall of 2009. It contrasts the Rome I rules on party autonomy with those in the United States. In particular, it considers the rules in the Rome I Regulation that ostensibly protect consumers by discouraging party agreement on a pre-dispute basis to the law governing a consumer contract. These rules are compared with the absence of private international law restrictions on choice of forum and choice of law in the United States, even in consumer contracts. The result …
Fundamental Norms, International Law, And The Extraterritorial Constitution, Jules Lobel
Fundamental Norms, International Law, And The Extraterritorial Constitution, Jules Lobel
Articles
The Supreme Court, in Boumediene v. Bush, decisively rejected the Bush Administration's argument that the Constitution does not apply to aliens detained by the United States government abroad. However, the functional, practicality focused test articulated in Boumediene to determine when the constitution applies extraterritorially is in considerable tension with the fundamental norms jurisprudence that underlies and pervades the Court’s opinion. This Article seeks to reintegrate Boumediene's fundamental norms jurisprudence into its functional test, arguing that the functional test for extraterritorial application of habeas rights should be informed by fundamental norms of international law. The Article argues that utilizing international law’s …