Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Agents (1)
- Barnwell Bros. v. South Carolina State Highway Dept. (1)
- Bond (1)
- Bondholder (1)
- Canada (1)
-
- Capital (1)
- Common carriers (1)
- Direct burden (1)
- Edwards v. International Pavement Co. (1)
- England (1)
- Expense (1)
- Fuel oil (1)
- Goods (1)
- Gross income (1)
- Gulf Fisheries Co. v. Maclnerney (1)
- Interstate Commerce Commission (1)
- Kansas City So. Ry. Co. v. U.S. (1)
- License fees (1)
- Mackintosh v. Flint & P.M.R. Co. (1)
- McGoldrick v. Gulf Oil Corp (1)
- Net income (1)
- Petroleum (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Sales Taxes, Interstate Trade Barriers, And Congress: The Gulf Oil Case, M. R. Schlesinger
Sales Taxes, Interstate Trade Barriers, And Congress: The Gulf Oil Case, M. R. Schlesinger
Michigan Law Review
The capacity of the federal government to deal with the increasingly irritating problem of interstate trade barriers is an important question high-lighted by the recent Supreme Court decision in McGoldrick v. Gulf Oil Corp. The Court there decided that in view of the superior federal authority over foreign commerce Congress could validly prohibit an otherwise legal city sales tax on imported petroleum manufactured into fuel oil and sold for use on foreign-bound ships.
Net Income And Judicial Economics, Henry Rottschaefer
Net Income And Judicial Economics, Henry Rottschaefer
Michigan Law Review
A legal system does not function in a vacuum of abstractions. It is part of a general institutional framework of an organized society. Its content is determined by concrete individual and social needs and activities. Hence modern jurisprudence conceives of law as a means for securing interests. The appraisal of its rules and principles requires an evaluation of the significant elements of the situation to which they apply. A narrow, complacent formalism is the penalty of failure in this regard. No one would deny the emphasis modern society places upor its commercial and industrial interests, nor the many points of …
Liability Of A Carrier Under A Bill Of Lading When The Goods Have Not Been Received By The Carrier, H S. Ross
Liability Of A Carrier Under A Bill Of Lading When The Goods Have Not Been Received By The Carrier, H S. Ross
Michigan Law Review
The coming into force on January I, 1917 in the United States of the FXDMAL BILL Or LADING AcT1 has given new interest to a question which was at one time much debated, namely: should a carrier whose shipmaster or agent has signed a bill of lading be liable to an innocent holder for value of such bill of lading if the carrier can show that the goods were never shipped?