Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (3)
- Title VII (2)
- AIDS (1)
- Abusive work environment (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
-
- Batson (1)
- Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Desegregation (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Female employee (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Glass ceiling (1)
- HIV (1)
- Hostile environment (1)
- Juror (1)
- Meritor Savings Bank v Vinson (1)
- Peremptory challenges (1)
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act (1)
- Reverse discrimination (1)
- Sexual harassment (1)
- United Auto Workers v. Johnson Controls (1)
- United States v. Moore (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
A Jurisprudence Of Equality: The Fourteenth Amendment And School Desegregation, Stewart Graham
A Jurisprudence Of Equality: The Fourteenth Amendment And School Desegregation, Stewart Graham
Akron Law Review
This paper will deal with the meaning of equality in legal discourse and the social context which underlies that meaning.
Meritor Savings Bank V. Vinson: The Supreme Court's Recognition Of The Hostile Environment In Sexual Harassment Claims, Victoria T. Bartels
Meritor Savings Bank V. Vinson: The Supreme Court's Recognition Of The Hostile Environment In Sexual Harassment Claims, Victoria T. Bartels
Akron Law Review
This casenote will examine Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson in light of the brief legal history of Title VII sexual harassment claims and will consider the implications of both the Court's holding and its dicta regarding the undecided issues.
Edmonson V. Leesville Concrete Co.: State Action Or Inaction - Does It Matter?, Chad Murdock
Edmonson V. Leesville Concrete Co.: State Action Or Inaction - Does It Matter?, Chad Murdock
Akron Law Review
This note first reviews the facts of Edmonson. Second, this note examines the history of judicial inquiry into the use of peremptory challenges. Third, this note reviews the application of Batson to civil cases. Finally, this note analyzes the extension of the state action doctrine in Edmonson and discusses an alternative to the Edmonson approach to state action
United States V. Moore: Aids And The Criminal Law: The Witch Hunt Begins, Robert Louis Stauter Md., J.D.
United States V. Moore: Aids And The Criminal Law: The Witch Hunt Begins, Robert Louis Stauter Md., J.D.
Akron Law Review
The United States v. Moore opinions written by Federal District Judge Diana E. Murphy and Circuit Judge Timbers reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of the disease process of AIDS. The purpose of this article is to help the reader critically analyze these court opinions. To facilitate this discussion the article will first provide the reader with some very basic, yet very technical, vocabulary used by medical specialists who care for and study patients with AIDS.
Mugwump, Mediator, Machiavellian, Or Majority? The Role Of Justice O'Connor In The Affirmative Action Cases, Thomas R. Haggard
Mugwump, Mediator, Machiavellian, Or Majority? The Role Of Justice O'Connor In The Affirmative Action Cases, Thomas R. Haggard
Akron Law Review
The purpose of this article is to provide a critical analysis of Justice O'Connor's affirmative action opinions. It will show that while her early record provides justification for all three characterizations, her more recent decisions suggest the emergency of a more favorable image. Her opinions in Croson and Media Broadcasting reflect the realization that a narrow, hair-splitting approach to this critical social and constitutional crisis will do little to hasten its resolution; that there is apparently no form of affirmative action that the liberal wing of the Court is unwilling to endorse, making her consensus by compromise approach a futile …
Civil Rights In The 1990'S: Non-Discrimination Or Quotas?, Donald B. Ayer
Civil Rights In The 1990'S: Non-Discrimination Or Quotas?, Donald B. Ayer
Akron Law Review
I would like today to offer some thoughts on the way that we as a country have handled the issue of reverse discrimination as a means of pursuing equal opportunity.
My first observation is that there is an undeniable tension between competing approaches to racial and gender justice that have been advanced and pursued in recent years. I take as my starting point the fundamental principle embodied in the Equal Protection Clause (as well as the Declaration of Independence), that, as the elder Justice Harlan said in dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson,' the Constitution is colorblind, and does not allow …
United Auto Workers V. Johnson Controls, Inc.: One Small Step For Womankind, A. L. Cherry
United Auto Workers V. Johnson Controls, Inc.: One Small Step For Womankind, A. L. Cherry
Akron Law Review
In United Auto Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court was faced with the task of deciding whether women's childbearing capacity could be used to limit women's job choices and opportunities within certain industrial/ manufacturing fields. The Court decided that the ability to bear children could be used to so limit women, but only if the employer met a high standard. In Johnson Controls, employees who worked in a toxic work environment sought a determination that their employer's fetal protection policy discriminated on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act …